Prostate-specific Antigen Bounce After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Four Prospective Trials.


Journal

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
received: 06 11 2018
revised: 05 03 2019
accepted: 01 04 2019
pubmed: 28 5 2019
medline: 14 5 2020
entrez: 26 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We conducted a pooled analysis of four prospective stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) trials of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer to evaluate the incidence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce and its correlation with the time-dose-fraction schedule. The correlation between bounce with PSA response at 4 years (nadir PSA < 0.4 ng/ml) and biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) was also explored. The study included four treatment groups: 35 Gy/five fractions once per week (QW) (TG-1; n = 84); 40 Gy/five fractions QW (TG-2; n = 100); 40 Gy/five fractions every other day (TG-3; n = 73); and 26 Gy/two fractions QW (TG-4; n = 30). PSA bounce was defined as a rise in PSA by 0.2 ng/ml (nadir + 0.2) or 2 ng/ml (nadir + 2.0) above nadir followed by a decrease back to nadir. Patients with fewer than three follow-up PSA tests were excluded from the pooled analysis. In total, 287 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 5.0 years. The pooled 5-year cumulative incidence of bounce by nadir + 2.0 was 8%. The 2-year cumulative incidences of PSA bounce by nadir + 0.2 were 28.9, 21, 19.6 and 16.7% (P = 0.12) and by nadir + 2.0 were 7.2, 8, 2.7 and 6.7% (P = 0.32) for TG-1 to TG-4, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that for nadir + 2.0, pre-treatment PSA (odds ratio 0.49; 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.97) correlated with PSA bounce. Although PSA bounce by nadir + 0.2 (odds ratio 0.10; 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.24) and nadir + 2.0 (odds ratio 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.93) was associated with a lower probability of PSA response at 4 years, there was no association between bounce by nadir + 0.2 (hazard ratio 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.08-1.74) or nadir + 2 (hazard ratio 1.77; 95% confidence interval 0.28-11.07) with BFFS. The incidence of PSA bounce was independent of time-dose-fraction schedule for prostate SBRT. One in 13 patients experienced a bounce high enough to be misinterpreted as biochemical failure, and clinicians should avoid early salvage interventions in these patients. There was no association between PSA bounce and BFFS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31126725
pii: S0936-6555(19)30193-1
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.05.001
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

621-629

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

S Roy (S)

Tom Baker Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

A Loblaw (A)

Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

P Cheung (P)

Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

W Chu (W)

Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

H T Chung (HT)

Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

D Vesprini (D)

Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

A Ong (A)

CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

A Chowdhury (A)

CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

D Panjwani (D)

BC Cancer Agency, Abbotsford, Canada.

G Pang (G)

Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

R Korol (R)

Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

M Davidson (M)

Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

A Ravi (A)

Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

B McCurdy (B)

CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

J Helou (J)

Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

L Zhang (L)

Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

A Mamedov (A)

Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

A Deabreu (A)

Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

H C Quon (HC)

Tom Baker Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. Electronic address: harvey.quon@albertahealthservices.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH