What influences the use of professional home care for individuals with spinal cord injury? A cross-sectional study on family caregivers.
Journal
Spinal cord
ISSN: 1476-5624
Titre abrégé: Spinal Cord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9609749
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
14
12
2018
accepted:
25
04
2019
revised:
22
04
2019
pubmed:
28
5
2019
medline:
1
5
2020
entrez:
26
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cross-sectional survey. The objective of this study is to identify what characteristics of the family caregivers influenced the use of professional home care for persons with SCI in Switzerland. Community setting, nationwide in Switzerland. Questionnaires were filled out by the adult family caregivers of persons with SCI. Influence of characteristics of the caregivers was analyzed with regression models, adjusting for the characteristics of the person with SCI. Logistic regression was used for whether professional home care was used. Poisson regression was applied for the absolute and relative amount of professional home care. In total, 717 family caregivers participated in the study (31% response rate). Among the participants, 33% hired professional home care for 10 h per week on average. The level of dependency of the persons with SCI had a significant influence on the utilization of care. The availability and proximity of the primary family caregiver, namely being spouse and cohabiting, reduced the amount of services used, whereas caregivers who worked full time employed more services. Higher levels of education and income increased the use of professional home care. Compared with their reference groups, caregivers with older age and those with a migratory background used comparable or larger absolute amount of professional services, which, however, represented a smaller proportion of total hours of care. Adequate support requires consideration of the characteristics of both the caregiver and of the person with SCI. The needs of family caregivers should also be assessed systematically in the needs assessment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31127196
doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0296-y
pii: 10.1038/s41393-019-0296-y
pmc: PMC6892416
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
924-932Subventions
Organisme : Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation)
ID : 160158
Organisme : Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation)
ID : 160158
Organisme : Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation)
ID : 160158
Références
J Rehabil Med. 2016 Feb;48(2):197-209
pubmed: 26931074
Aging Ment Health. 2004 Nov;8(6):535-43
pubmed: 15724836
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;90(11 Suppl 2):S5-16
pubmed: 21975676
Stat Methods Med Res. 2007 Jun;16(3):219-42
pubmed: 17621469
Spinal Cord. 2016 Aug;54(8):562-9
pubmed: 26902459
Disabil Health J. 2015 Oct;8(4):527-34
pubmed: 26129842
Spinal Cord. 2005 May;43(5):311-9
pubmed: 15685263
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Oct;55(7):1255-66
pubmed: 12365535
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Nov-Dec;40(6):511-6
pubmed: 15077663
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(7):531-41
pubmed: 22087755
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Oct;83(10):1399-405
pubmed: 12370876
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct;98(10):2042-2051
pubmed: 28286200
Stroke. 2005 Oct;36(10):2181-6
pubmed: 16151029
J Fam Issues. 2012 May;33(5):662-689
pubmed: 32123460
J Health Econ. 2004 Nov;23(6):1159-80
pubmed: 15556241
Spinal Cord. 2018 May;56(5):436-446
pubmed: 29335472
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Jun;66(3):272-306
pubmed: 19174538
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Aug;78(8):822-7
pubmed: 9344300
Health Policy. 2015 Jun;119(6):840-9
pubmed: 25467791