Monitoring a Combination of Calprotectin and Infliximab Identifies Patients With Mucosal Healing of Crohn's Disease.


Journal

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
ISSN: 1542-7714
Titre abrégé: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101160775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2020
Historique:
received: 17 02 2019
revised: 24 04 2019
accepted: 17 05 2019
pubmed: 28 5 2019
medline: 19 8 2021
entrez: 26 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the TAILORIX trial, no benefit could be shown by infliximab dose escalation based on pharmacokinetic (infliximab serum concentrations) and pharmacodynamic (biomarkers and symptoms) monitoring compared with dose escalation based on symptoms alone in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated whether integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic monitoring can be used to evaluate responses to infliximab induction and maintenance therapy, based on findings from endoscopy. We performed a post hoc analysis of patients with CD included in a trial to test the effects of infliximab dose escalation, based on biomarkers and serum concentrations of infliximab, on symptoms (the Study Investigating Tailored Treatment With Infliximab for Active Crohn's Disease trial; n = 122). We analyzed data from this study to determine whether concentrations of biomarkers and serum concentrations of infliximab were associated with endoscopic outcomes (n = 116). The primary end points were endoscopic response (CD endoscopic index of severity decrease ≥50% from baseline), endoscopic remission (CD endoscopic index of severity, <3), and absence of ulcers at weeks 12 and 54 of infliximab treatment. Infliximab trough concentrations greater than 23.1 mg/L at week 2 and greater than 10.0 mg/L at week 6 were associated with endoscopic remission at week 12 (positive predictive values, 72% and 76%; negative predictive values, 65% and 59%, respectively). During maintenance therapy, we found evidence for an exposure-response relationship only after dose escalation; trough concentrations greater than 10.6 mg/L were associated with the absence of ulcers at week 54 (positive predictive value, 49%; negative predictive value, 92%). Low fecal concentrations of calprotectin during therapy were associated with endoscopic response and remission (P < .05). Dose escalations increased trough concentrations of infliximab; persistent increase in fecal concentration of calprotectin, despite dose escalation, was associated with a lack of endoscopic response and remission. A significantly higher proportion of patients with antibodies to infliximab, identified by a drug-tolerant assay, dropped out of the study compared with patients without antibodies (P < .0001). In a post hoc analysis of data from a trial to test the effects of infliximab dose escalation on symptoms, we found that during maintenance therapy, the combination of fecal concentration of calprotectin and trough concentration of infliximab can guide dose adjustment and increase the chances for endoscopic response and remission. ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu EudraCT no: 2011-003038-14.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND & AIMS
In the TAILORIX trial, no benefit could be shown by infliximab dose escalation based on pharmacokinetic (infliximab serum concentrations) and pharmacodynamic (biomarkers and symptoms) monitoring compared with dose escalation based on symptoms alone in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated whether integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic monitoring can be used to evaluate responses to infliximab induction and maintenance therapy, based on findings from endoscopy.
METHODS
We performed a post hoc analysis of patients with CD included in a trial to test the effects of infliximab dose escalation, based on biomarkers and serum concentrations of infliximab, on symptoms (the Study Investigating Tailored Treatment With Infliximab for Active Crohn's Disease trial; n = 122). We analyzed data from this study to determine whether concentrations of biomarkers and serum concentrations of infliximab were associated with endoscopic outcomes (n = 116). The primary end points were endoscopic response (CD endoscopic index of severity decrease ≥50% from baseline), endoscopic remission (CD endoscopic index of severity, <3), and absence of ulcers at weeks 12 and 54 of infliximab treatment.
RESULTS
Infliximab trough concentrations greater than 23.1 mg/L at week 2 and greater than 10.0 mg/L at week 6 were associated with endoscopic remission at week 12 (positive predictive values, 72% and 76%; negative predictive values, 65% and 59%, respectively). During maintenance therapy, we found evidence for an exposure-response relationship only after dose escalation; trough concentrations greater than 10.6 mg/L were associated with the absence of ulcers at week 54 (positive predictive value, 49%; negative predictive value, 92%). Low fecal concentrations of calprotectin during therapy were associated with endoscopic response and remission (P < .05). Dose escalations increased trough concentrations of infliximab; persistent increase in fecal concentration of calprotectin, despite dose escalation, was associated with a lack of endoscopic response and remission. A significantly higher proportion of patients with antibodies to infliximab, identified by a drug-tolerant assay, dropped out of the study compared with patients without antibodies (P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS
In a post hoc analysis of data from a trial to test the effects of infliximab dose escalation on symptoms, we found that during maintenance therapy, the combination of fecal concentration of calprotectin and trough concentration of infliximab can guide dose adjustment and increase the chances for endoscopic response and remission. ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu EudraCT no: 2011-003038-14.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31128336
pii: S1542-3565(19)30551-8
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.029
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Gastrointestinal Agents 0
Leukocyte L1 Antigen Complex 0
Infliximab B72HH48FLU

Banques de données

EudraCT
['EudraCT 2011-003038-14']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

637-646.e11

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Erwin Dreesen (E)

Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: erwin.dreesen@kuleuven.be.

Filip Baert (F)

Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.

David Laharie (D)

Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie et Oncologie Digestive, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux, France.

Peter Bossuyt (P)

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinic, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.

Yoram Bouhnik (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology, Beaujon Hospital, APHP, Paris Diderot University, Clichy, France.

Anthony Buisson (A)

Department of Gastroenterology, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Guy Lambrecht (G)

Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Damiaan, Oostende, Belgium.

Edouard Louis (E)

Department of Gastroenterology, Liège University Hospital CHU Liège, Belgium.

Bas Oldenburg (B)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Benjamin Pariente (B)

Department of Gastroenterology, Huriez Hospital, Lille 2 University, Lille, France.

Marieke Pierik (M)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

C Janneke van der Woude (CJ)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Geert D'Haens (G)

Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Séverine Vermeire (S)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Ann Gils (A)

Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH