A Low-Cost and Unsupervised Image Recognition Methodology for Yield Estimation in a Vineyard.
UAV
computer vision
high throughput field-phenotyping
unsupervised detection
yield estimation
Journal
Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
31
10
2018
accepted:
12
04
2019
entrez:
28
5
2019
pubmed:
28
5
2019
medline:
28
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Yield prediction is a key factor to optimize vineyard management and achieve the desired grape quality. Classical yield estimation methods, which consist of manual sampling within the field on a limited number of plants before harvest, are time-consuming and frequently insufficient to obtain representative yield data. Non-invasive machine vision methods are therefore being investigated to assess and implement a rapid grape yield estimate tool. This study aimed at an automated estimation of yield in terms of cluster number and size from high resolution RGB images (20 MP) taken with a low-cost UAV platform in representative zones of the vigor variability within an experimental vineyard. The flight campaigns were conducted in different light conditions and canopy cover levels for 2017 and 2018 crop seasons. An unsupervised recognition algorithm was applied to derive cluster number and size, which was used for estimating yield per vine. The results related to the number of clusters detected in different conditions, and the weight estimation for each vigor zone are presented. The segmentation results in cluster detection showed a performance of over 85% in partially leaf removal and full ripe condition, and allowed grapevine yield to be estimated with more than 84% of accuracy several weeks before harvest. The application of innovative technologies in field-phenotyping such as UAV, high-resolution cameras and visual computing algorithms enabled a new methodology to assess yield, which can save time and provide an accurate estimate compared to the manual method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31130974
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00559
pmc: PMC6509744
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
559Références
J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Sep 24;51(20):5877-81
pubmed: 13129288
J Agric Food Chem. 2005 May 18;53(10):4019-25
pubmed: 15884833
Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Aug;111(4):658-64
pubmed: 15995866
Genome. 2006 Dec;49(12):1572-85
pubmed: 17426772
BMC Plant Biol. 2008 Apr 17;8:38
pubmed: 18419811
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Sensors (Basel). 2012 Dec 12;12(12):16988-7006
pubmed: 23235443
J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Aug;94(10):1981-7
pubmed: 24302287
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 May 21;62(20):4558-70
pubmed: 24773241
J Sci Food Agric. 2015 Apr;95(6):1274-82
pubmed: 25041796
J Food Sci Technol. 2015 May;52(5):3065-71
pubmed: 25892810
J Sci Food Agric. 2016 Oct;96(13):4575-83
pubmed: 26910811
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jul 13;9:1024
pubmed: 30057587