The concept of therapeutic hierarchy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter cohort study.


Journal

Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver
ISSN: 1478-3231
Titre abrégé: Liver Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101160857

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2019
Historique:
received: 16 01 2019
revised: 26 03 2019
accepted: 16 04 2019
pubmed: 28 5 2019
medline: 18 9 2020
entrez: 28 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) prognostic system for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has recently been proposed and validated. We sought to explore the relationship among the ITA.LI.CA prognostic variables (ie tumour stage, functional score based on performance status and Child-Pugh score, and alpha-fetoprotein), treatment selection and survival outcome in HCC patients. We analysed 4,867 consecutive HCC patients undergoing six main treatment strategies (liver transplantation, LT; liver resection, LR; ablation, ABL; intra-arterial therapy, IAT; Sorafenib, SOR; and best supportive care, BSC) and enrolled during 2002-2015 in a multicenter Italian database. In order to control pretreatment imbalances in observed variables, a machine learning methodology was used and inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) was calculated. An IPTW-adjusted multivariate survival model that included ITA.LI.CA prognostic variables, treatment period and treatment strategy was then developed. The survival benefit of HCC treatments was described as a hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), using BSC as a reference value and as predicted median survival. After the IPTW, the six treatment groups became well balanced for most baseline characteristics. In the IPTW-adjusted multivariate survival model, treatment strategy was found to be the strongest survival predictor, irrespective of ITA.LI.CA prognostic variables and treatment period. The survival benefit of different therapies over BSC was: LT = 0.19 (0.18-0.20); RES = 0.40 (0.37-0.42); ABL 0.42 (0.40-0.44); IAT = 0.58 (0.55-0.61); SOR = 0.92 (0.87-0.97). This multivariate model was then used to predict median survival for each therapy within each ITA.LI.CA stage. The concept of therapeutic hierarchy was established within each ITA.LI.CA stage.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The Italian Liver Cancer (ITA.LI.CA) prognostic system for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has recently been proposed and validated. We sought to explore the relationship among the ITA.LI.CA prognostic variables (ie tumour stage, functional score based on performance status and Child-Pugh score, and alpha-fetoprotein), treatment selection and survival outcome in HCC patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We analysed 4,867 consecutive HCC patients undergoing six main treatment strategies (liver transplantation, LT; liver resection, LR; ablation, ABL; intra-arterial therapy, IAT; Sorafenib, SOR; and best supportive care, BSC) and enrolled during 2002-2015 in a multicenter Italian database. In order to control pretreatment imbalances in observed variables, a machine learning methodology was used and inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) was calculated. An IPTW-adjusted multivariate survival model that included ITA.LI.CA prognostic variables, treatment period and treatment strategy was then developed. The survival benefit of HCC treatments was described as a hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), using BSC as a reference value and as predicted median survival.
RESULTS
After the IPTW, the six treatment groups became well balanced for most baseline characteristics. In the IPTW-adjusted multivariate survival model, treatment strategy was found to be the strongest survival predictor, irrespective of ITA.LI.CA prognostic variables and treatment period. The survival benefit of different therapies over BSC was: LT = 0.19 (0.18-0.20); RES = 0.40 (0.37-0.42); ABL 0.42 (0.40-0.44); IAT = 0.58 (0.55-0.61); SOR = 0.92 (0.87-0.97). This multivariate model was then used to predict median survival for each therapy within each ITA.LI.CA stage.
CONCLUSION
The concept of therapeutic hierarchy was established within each ITA.LI.CA stage.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31131974
doi: 10.1111/liv.14154
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1478-1489

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Auteurs

Alessandro Vitale (A)

Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Fabio Farinati (F)

Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Timothy M Pawlik (TM)

Department of Surgery, Wexner Medical Center at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Anna Chiara Frigo (AC)

Biostatistic Unit, Padua University, Padua, Italy.

Edoardo G Giannini (EG)

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS-Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino-IST, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Lucia Napoli (L)

Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Francesco Ciccarese (F)

Division of Surgery, San Marco Hospital, Zingonia, Italy.

Gian Ludovico Rapaccini (GL)

Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Complesso Integrato Columbus, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Maria Di Marco (M)

Division of Medicine, Bolognini Hospital, Seriate, Italy.

Eugenio Caturelli (E)

Division of Gastroenterology, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo, Italy.

Marco Zoli (M)

Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Franco Borzio (F)

Division of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Rodolfo Sacco (R)

Division of Gastroenterology and Metabolic Diseases, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Giuseppe Cabibbo (G)

Division of Gastroenterology, Biomedical Department of Internal and Specialistic Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

Roberto Virdone (R)

Division of Internal Medicine 2, Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy.

Fabio Marra (F)

Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy.

Martina Felder (M)

Division of Gastroenterology, Bolzano Regional Hospital, Bolzano, Italy.

Filomena Morisco (F)

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples, "Federico II", Naples, Italy.

Luisa Benvegnù (L)

Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Antonio Gasbarrini (A)

Division of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Policlinico Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.

Gianluca Svegliati-Baroni (G)

Division of Gastroenterology, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Francesco Giuseppe Foschi (FG)

Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale per gli Infermi di Faenza, Faenza, Italy.

Gabriele Missale (G)

Division of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy.

Alberto Masotto (A)

Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar, Italy.

Gerardo Nardone (G)

Hepato-Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Napoli, Italy.

Antonio Colecchia (A)

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Mauro Bernardi (M)

Division of Semeiotics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Franco Trevisani (F)

Division of Semeiotics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Umberto Cillo (U)

Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH