Management of Port Occlusions in Adults: Different-Site Replacement versus Same-Site Salvage.


Journal

Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
ISSN: 1535-7732
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Interv Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203369

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
received: 02 07 2018
revised: 16 01 2019
accepted: 14 02 2019
pubmed: 28 5 2019
medline: 7 1 2020
entrez: 29 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To compare the safety and effectiveness of different-site port placement versus same-site port salvage in adult patients with occluded ports. Ninety-five occluded subcutaneous infusion ports (ports) in 95 patients presenting between July 1, 2002, and June 30, 2017, were retrospectively reviewed: 48 (51%) different-site placements (replacements; same-day indwelling port removal and different-site new port placement) and 47 (49%) same-site salvages (salvages; 35 fibrin sheath strippings, 12 over-the-wire exchanges). Demographic information, indication for initial placement and replacement or salvage, procedural details, post-intervention primary catheter patency, and post-intervention port sequelae were recorded. Post-intervention primary catheter patency, and malfunction and infection rates were compared with Kaplan-Meier estimation and the log-rank test, and Fisher exact test, respectively. The association of patient risk factors and port patency was assessed with Cox regression. Median primary catheter patency after replacement was 254 days (interquartile range [IQR], 297) and after salvage was 391 days (IQR, 906) (P = .25). Within the salvage group, median primary catheter patency after stripping was 391 days (IQR, 658) and after exchange was 666 days (IQR, 1412) (P = .08). There was no statistical difference in malfunction (P = .12) and infection (P = .74) rates between the replaced and salvaged groups or in malfunction (P = .09) and infection (P = .1) rates between the exchanged and stripped subgroups. None of the patient or catheter characteristics assessed were significantly associated with primary catheter patency. There was no statistical difference between patency, malfunctions, or infections after replacement and salvage, or after stripping and exchange, so technique selection should be based on the patient's estimated lifetime venous access requirements, cost, and physician preference.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31133452
pii: S1051-0443(19)30309-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.02.027
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1069-1074

Informations de copyright

Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Waleska M Pabon-Ramos (WM)

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710. Electronic address: waly.pr@duke.edu.

Oretunlewa Soyinka (O)

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Tony P Smith (TP)

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.

James Ronald (J)

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.

Paul V Suhocki (PV)

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.

Charles Y Kim (CY)

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH