An Investigation on Bilateral Asymmetry in Electrodermal Activity.
bilateral asymmetry
electrodermal activity
emotional arousal
skin conductance
sympathetic nervous system
Journal
Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5153
Titre abrégé: Front Behav Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477952
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
02
10
2018
accepted:
11
04
2019
entrez:
29
5
2019
pubmed:
28
5
2019
medline:
28
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Multiple Arousal Theory (Picard et al., 2016) was proposed to explain retrospective observations of bilateral differences in electrodermal activities occurring in threat-related high-stake situations. The theory proposes different cortical and subcortical structures to be involved in the processing of various facets of emotional states. Systematic investigations of this effect are still scarce. This study tested the prediction of bilateral electrodermal effects in a controlled laboratory environment where electrodermal activity (EDA) was recorded bilaterally during normal activity and two stress-tasks in 25 healthy volunteers. A visual search stress task with a performance-related staircase algorithm was used, ensuring intersubjectively comparable stress levels across individuals. After completion of the task, a sense of ownership of an attractive price was created and loss aversion introduced to create a high-stake situation. Confirmation of the theory should satisfy the hypothesis of a bilateral difference in EDA between the dominant and non-dominant hand, which is larger during high-stake stressors than during low-stake stressors. The bilateral difference was quantified and compared statistically between the two stress-tasks, revealing no significant difference between them nor any significant difference between the stress tasks and the period of normal activity. Subgroup analysis of only the participants with maximum self-rating of their desire to win the price (
Identifiants
pubmed: 31133830
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00088
pmc: PMC6514357
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
88Références
Psychometrika. 2015 Dec;80(4):1105-22
pubmed: 25142256
Physiol Behav. 2012 May 15;106(2):298-304
pubmed: 22330325
Physiol Meas. 2008 Jun;29(6):S407-15
pubmed: 18544832
Muscle Nerve. 1998 Jan;21(1):34-9
pubmed: 9427221
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70
pubmed: 3397865
Science. 2007 Jan 26;315(5811):515-8
pubmed: 17255512
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Mar;8(3):341-50
pubmed: 22275168
Int J Psychophysiol. 1996 Apr-May;22(1-2):1-8
pubmed: 8799763
Psychophysiology. 1984 Jul;21(4):371-93
pubmed: 6379724
Psychophysiology. 2017 Mar;54(3):374-385
pubmed: 28000290
Soc Neurosci. 2011;6(2):169-77
pubmed: 20661838
Neuropsychobiology. 1993;28(1-2):76-81
pubmed: 8255414
Psychophysiology. 1994 Mar;31(2):196-200
pubmed: 8153256
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:1844-1848
pubmed: 29060249
Pavlov J Biol Sci. 1989 Oct-Dec;24(4):150-5
pubmed: 2616227
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jun;17(6):1307-13
pubmed: 16880223
Physiol Meas. 2010 Oct;31(10):1395-410
pubmed: 20811086
Ergonomics. 1995 Jul;38(7):1342-51
pubmed: 7635125
Biol Psychol. 2010 Jul;84(3):394-421
pubmed: 20371374
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 May;65(5):568-76
pubmed: 18458208
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2018 Sep;43(3):203-210
pubmed: 29926237
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31
pubmed: 17835457
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Nov;47(5):1105-17
pubmed: 6520704
Biol Psychol. 2006 Jan;71(1):42-53
pubmed: 16360880
Science. 2006 Aug 4;313(5787):684-7
pubmed: 16888142
Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8
pubmed: 7455683