Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer: The Patients' Perspective.
organ preservation
psychooncology
radiochemotherapy
radiotherapy
rectal cancer
shared decision making
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
18
01
2019
accepted:
08
04
2019
entrez:
29
5
2019
pubmed:
28
5
2019
medline:
28
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Organ preservation after a clinical complete response to radiochemotherapy is currently one of the most discussed topics in the management of rectal cancer. However, the patients' perspective has only been poorly studied so far. In this multicenter study, we examined 49 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The willingness to participate in an organ preservation study and the acceptance of the associated aspects such as intensified radiochemotherapy protocols, the need for close follow-up examinations and local regrowth rates were assessed. Attitudes were correlated with baseline quality of life parameters and psychological scales for "fear of progression", "locus of control", "depression", and the "willingness to take risks". A total of 83% of patients would consider the deferral of surgery in case of a clinical complete response (cCR). Three monthly follow-up studies and a 25% local regrowth rate are considered acceptable by 95% and 94% respectively. While 41% would be willing to exchange cure rates for a non-operative treatment strategy, a potentially more toxic radiochemotherapy in order to increase the probability of a cCR was the aspect with the lowest acceptance (55%). Psychological factors, in particular "locus of control" and "willingness to take risks", influenced patient preferences regarding most of the assessed parameters. While in general a broad acceptance of an organ-preserving treatment can be expected, patient preferences and concerns regarding different aspects of this strategy vary widely and require specific consideration during shared decision making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31134146
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00318
pmc: PMC6524150
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
318Références
J Psychosom Res. 2005 Jun;58(6):505-11
pubmed: 16125517
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):163-73
pubmed: 18752852
Br J Nurs. 2009 Jul 9-22;18(13):790-3
pubmed: 19593309
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 10;29(35):4633-40
pubmed: 22067400
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1926-33
pubmed: 22529255
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jul;13(7):679-87
pubmed: 22627104
Int J Hyperthermia. 2012;28(8):707-14
pubmed: 23006132
J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Sep;7(3):300-22
pubmed: 23475398
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Jun;29(2):289-95
pubmed: 24390589
Acta Oncol. 2014 Jul;53(7):958-65
pubmed: 24456505
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Dec 1;90(5):1153-60
pubmed: 25442042
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):919-27
pubmed: 26156652
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Jul 02;9:899-911
pubmed: 26170640
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):957-66
pubmed: 26187751
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):174-183
pubmed: 26705854
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):e134-e135
pubmed: 27300672
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Aug 10;108(12):
pubmed: 27509881
Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1673-1681
pubmed: 29479673
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2017 Mar 23;3:9-15
pubmed: 29658007
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Aug;61(8):911-919
pubmed: 29697477
Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2537-2545
pubmed: 29976470
BMJ. 1988 Nov 5;297(6657):1167-9
pubmed: 3144332
Psychol Med. 1980 Feb;10(1):145-52
pubmed: 7384316
Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Apr;38(4):361-9
pubmed: 7720441
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
Cancer. 1977 Jul;40(1):180-4
pubmed: 880549
West J Med. 1996 Jul-Aug;165(1-2):26-30
pubmed: 8855681
Qual Life Res. 1997 Mar;6(2):133-8
pubmed: 9161113