Effects of Operating Parameters on Ionic Liquid Membrane to Remove Humidity in a Green Continuous Process.

gas separation ionic liquid-based membrane processes membrane regeneration operating parameters removing humidity

Journal

Membranes
ISSN: 2077-0375
Titre abrégé: Membranes (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101577807

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 May 2019
Historique:
received: 29 03 2019
revised: 08 05 2019
accepted: 18 05 2019
entrez: 30 5 2019
pubmed: 30 5 2019
medline: 30 5 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Membrane processes are promising methods to separate gases from feed streams without phase changing. A hybrid process, the combination of ionic liquids with a ceramic membrane (ILM), has been developed for humidity removal in a green continuous process. This new concept provides a more efficient and available ionic liquid (IL)-based membrane regeneration process, which just switches the moist feed stream to dry air. Furthermore, the ILM presents high stability and mechanical resistance during long-time operation. In addition, the influences of several operating parameters, including flow rate, temperature, absolute pressure, and feed concentration on process efficiency were investigated. The lower inlet flow rate was found to be favorable for drying humid air. Moreover, when the pressure increased, the mass of absorbed water was increased, while the feed concentration had no significant effects on the membrane separation performance. However, the operating temperature had a great effect on humidity removal. It is necessary to note that the processes at room temperature can limit the energy consumption. The absorbing process of ILM remained efficient after several absorption desorption cycles. Therefore, the new ILM hybrid process that has been developed has great potential for consecutive humidity removal processes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31137679
pii: membranes9050065
doi: 10.3390/membranes9050065
pmc: PMC6572301
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Chem Rev. 2002 Oct;102(10):3667-92
pubmed: 12371898
Appl Spectrosc. 2003 Feb;57(2):152-7
pubmed: 14610951
Nat Mater. 2009 Aug;8(8):621-9
pubmed: 19629083
J Phys Chem B. 2010 Apr 15;114(14):4747-54
pubmed: 20337406
Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(3):2088-106
pubmed: 22294916
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012 Sep 21;14(35):12252-62
pubmed: 22868292
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014 Jan;99:1-12
pubmed: 24210364

Auteurs

Xueru Yan (X)

Aix Marseille Univ., Centrale Marseille, CNRS, M2P2 Aix en Provence, France. xueruy@yahoo.com.sg.

Alexandre Favard (A)

Aix Marseille Univ., Université de Toulon, CNRS, IM2NP Marseille, France. alexandre.favard@ecologicsense.fr.

Stéphane Anguille (S)

Aix Marseille Univ., Centrale Marseille, CNRS, M2P2 Aix en Provence, France. stephane.anguille@univ-amu.fr.

Marc Bendahan (M)

Aix Marseille Univ., Université de Toulon, CNRS, IM2NP Marseille, France. marc.bendahan@univ-amu.fr.

Philippe Moulin (P)

Aix Marseille Univ., Centrale Marseille, CNRS, M2P2 Aix en Provence, France. philippe.moulin@univ-amu.fr.

Classifications MeSH