Assessment of the Role of the Mandibular First Molar Tooth in Mandibular Fracture Patterns of 29 Dogs.
fracture
mandible
mandible fracture
mandibular first molar
trauma
veterinary dentistry
Journal
Journal of veterinary dentistry
ISSN: 2470-4083
Titre abrégé: J Vet Dent
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9426426
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
entrez:
30
5
2019
pubmed:
30
5
2019
medline:
7
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mandibular fractures at the level of the first molar tooth (M1) were assessed in 29 dogs. Patients included in this study demonstrated fractures involving the M1 tooth, tooth bud, or alveolus (if tooth was absent). Diagnostic imaging evaluation included intraoral dental radiography and/or computed tomography (CT) with 3D reconstruction. The distal root was involved in 55.2% of cases, mesial root involvement in 34.5% of cases, and the tooth was absent in 10.3% of cases. Fractures were described in the rostral-to-caudal direction. Fractures tended to occur in the caudoventral direction ( P = .057). Cases with CT imaging were also evaluated in the buccolingual direction. Fractures were found to occur significantly more frequently in the caudolingual direction ( P = .022). When classifying fracture patterns along M1 according to a previously published fracture classification system, it was noted that fractures occurred significantly more frequently in either the mesial ( P < .001) or distal ( P < .001) roots by coursing along the periodontal ligament space and communicating with the periapical region. Active or nonworsening periodontitis was described as radiographic or tomographic evidence of (>25%) bone loss in the vertical or horizontal direction. Periodontitis was associated with 7 (24.1%) cases. These results help frame the challenges associated with fracture repair at the M1 location. Treatment planning considerations should include limited structural support caudal to fractures involving the distal root, more frequent involvement of the distal root over the mesial root, risk for poor endodontic prognosis, and the predilection for unfavorable fracture patterns to occur.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31138050
doi: 10.1177/0898756419846183
pmc: PMC6953385
mid: NIHMS1064890
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
32-39Subventions
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000427
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002373
Pays : United States
Références
Int J Oral Surg. 1978 Apr;7(2):100-3
pubmed: 98455
J Vet Dent. 1994 Oct;11(3):94-105
pubmed: 9693607
J Small Anim Pract. 1979 Nov;20(11):661-74
pubmed: 547112
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 May;60(5):514-8
pubmed: 11988927
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2015 Mar;8(1):59-63
pubmed: 25709754
Vet Surg. 2016 Jan;45(1):21-9
pubmed: 26382250
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Jun;79(6):680-4
pubmed: 7621022
Vet Rec. 1984 Sep 15;115(11):273-4
pubmed: 6495579
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2013;26(1):1-5
pubmed: 23111902
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Apr;58(4):394-8; discussion 399
pubmed: 10759119
J Vet Dent. 2005 Jun;22(2):86-90
pubmed: 16149386
Br J Oral Surg. 1980 Sep;18(2):125-31
pubmed: 6934803
J Vet Dent. 2001 Jun;18(2):65-8
pubmed: 11968914
J Vet Dent. 2005 Dec;22(4):216-26
pubmed: 16494269
Vet Surg. 1990 Jul-Aug;19(4):272-5
pubmed: 2382396
Am J Vet Res. 1992 Feb;53(2):258-61
pubmed: 1575395
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Jun;53(6):646-9; discussion 649-50
pubmed: 7776046
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009 Sep;8(3):237-40
pubmed: 23139516