Sexual selection drives the evolution of male wing interference patterns.
Drosophila
courtship
evolution
sensory ecology
sexual selection
Journal
Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 05 2019
29 05 2019
Historique:
entrez:
30
5
2019
pubmed:
30
5
2019
medline:
6
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The seemingly transparent wings of many insects have recently been found to display unexpected structural coloration. These structural colours (wing interference patterns: WIPs) may be involved in species recognition and mate choice, yet little is known about the evolutionary processes that shape them. Furthermore, to date investigations of WIPs have not fully considered how they are actually perceived by the viewers' colour vision. Here, we use multispectral digital imaging and a model of Drosophila vision to compare WIPs of male and female Drosophila simulans from replicate populations forced to evolve with or without sexual selection for 68 generations. We show that WIPs modelled in Drosophila vision evolve in response to sexual selection and provide evidence that WIPs correlate with male sexual attractiveness. These findings add a new element to the otherwise well-described Drosophila courtship display and confirm that wing colours evolve through sexual selection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31138076
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2850
pmc: PMC6545089
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4502339']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20182850Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:471-510
pubmed: 11112177
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Feb;78(1):81-118
pubmed: 12620062
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jun 22;273(1593):1455-8
pubmed: 16777737
Science. 1986 Apr 25;232(4749):494-7
pubmed: 3083506
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Oct;6(10):741-51
pubmed: 18794912
J Evol Biol. 2011 Dec;24(12):2653-62
pubmed: 21955226
Curr Biol. 2007 Nov 20;17(22):R959-60
pubmed: 18029248
Curr Biol. 2008 Jul 8;18(13):R553-4
pubmed: 18606122
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 25;8(6):e67623
pubmed: 23825675
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Nov;78(4):575-95
pubmed: 14700392
J Neurosci. 1999 Dec 15;19(24):10716-26
pubmed: 10594055
J Evol Biol. 2013 Feb;26(2):311-24
pubmed: 23206188
Genetica. 2008 Sep;134(1):113-27
pubmed: 17874278
Curr Biol. 2010 Nov 23;20(22):2036-9
pubmed: 21055943
Evol Biol. 2016;43:267-275
pubmed: 27217597
Curr Biol. 2001 Apr 3;11(7):489-93
pubmed: 11412998
Annu Rev Genet. 2000;34:205-232
pubmed: 11092827
J Evol Biol. 2010 Aug;23(8):1672-9
pubmed: 20546089
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 27;96(9):5083-8
pubmed: 10220422
Genetics. 2000 May;155(1):167-78
pubmed: 10790392
Development. 2013 Feb 1;140(3):493-503
pubmed: 23293281
Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42:587-609
pubmed: 15012323
Curr Biol. 2013 Dec 2;23(23):2375-82
pubmed: 24268411
Curr Biol. 2007 Dec 4;17(23):R1002-3
pubmed: 18054757
Evolution. 2012 Mar;66(3):665-677
pubmed: 22380431
Annu Rev Entomol. 1974;19:385-405
pubmed: 4205689
PLoS One. 2013 May 22;8(5):e63807
pubmed: 23717488
Evolution. 2006 Sep;60(9):1868-73
pubmed: 17089971
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 11;108(2):668-73
pubmed: 21199954
Methods Ecol Evol. 2015 Nov;6(11):1320-1331
pubmed: 27076902
Anim Behav. 1999 Sep;58(3):649-657
pubmed: 10479381
Evolution. 2016 Apr;70(4):913-21
pubmed: 26940698
J Evol Biol. 2011 Feb;24(2):363-71
pubmed: 21091568
J Evol Biol. 2013 Jan;26(1):94-107
pubmed: 23163514
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 5;94(16):8618-21
pubmed: 9238026
Curr Biol. 2011 Jan 25;21(2):R62-5
pubmed: 21256434
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 21;111(42):15144-8
pubmed: 25294931
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Am Nat. 2005 May;165 Suppl 5:S72-87
pubmed: 15795864