Co-production of single cell oil and gluconic acid using oleaginous
Carbon flow
Co-production
Gluconic acid (GA)
Regulation
Single cell oil (SCO)
Journal
Biotechnology for biofuels
ISSN: 1754-6834
Titre abrégé: Biotechnol Biofuels
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101316935
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
30
01
2019
accepted:
15
05
2019
entrez:
30
5
2019
pubmed:
30
5
2019
medline:
30
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The co-production of single cell oil (SCO) with value-added products could improve the economic viability of industrial SCO production. The newly isolated oleaginous yeast The carbon flow distribution between SCO and GA was significantly influenced by the cultivation conditions, such as nitrogen sources, glucose concentration and dissolved oxygen concentration. It was found that organic nitrogen sources were beneficial for SCO accumulation, while GA production was decreased. Dissolved oxygen concentration (DOC) was found to enhance SCO accumulation, while high glucose concentration was more favorable for GA accumulation. Hence, a two-stage DOC or glucose concentration-controlled strategy was designed to improve cell growth and direct carbon distribution between SCO and GA. Moreover, Co-production of SCO and GA by
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The co-production of single cell oil (SCO) with value-added products could improve the economic viability of industrial SCO production. The newly isolated oleaginous yeast
RESULTS
RESULTS
The carbon flow distribution between SCO and GA was significantly influenced by the cultivation conditions, such as nitrogen sources, glucose concentration and dissolved oxygen concentration. It was found that organic nitrogen sources were beneficial for SCO accumulation, while GA production was decreased. Dissolved oxygen concentration (DOC) was found to enhance SCO accumulation, while high glucose concentration was more favorable for GA accumulation. Hence, a two-stage DOC or glucose concentration-controlled strategy was designed to improve cell growth and direct carbon distribution between SCO and GA. Moreover,
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Co-production of SCO and GA by
Identifiants
pubmed: 31139257
doi: 10.1186/s13068-019-1469-9
pii: 1469
pmc: PMC6528270
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
127Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
J Biotechnol. 2000 Jul 28;81(1):27-34
pubmed: 10936657
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002 Mar;58(3):308-12
pubmed: 11935181
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 Apr;78(6):927-38
pubmed: 18330562
J Appl Microbiol. 2008 Nov;105(5):1521-8
pubmed: 19146489
Chem Commun (Camb). 2009 Dec 14;(46):7179-81
pubmed: 19921022
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Apr;101(7):2351-8
pubmed: 19962884
J Biosci Bioeng. 2011 Jul;112(1):71-4
pubmed: 21498112
Bioresour Technol. 2012 May;111:398-403
pubmed: 22366600
Microb Cell Fact. 2012 Jul 30;11:99
pubmed: 22846176
Biotechnol Adv. 2013 Mar-Apr;31(2):129-39
pubmed: 22960618
Microbiology. 2014 Apr;160(Pt 4):807-17
pubmed: 24509502
AMB Express. 2014 Mar 18;4:24
pubmed: 24949259
Biotechnol Adv. 2014 Nov 15;32(7):1328-1335
pubmed: 25172032
Trends Biotechnol. 2015 Jan;33(1):43-54
pubmed: 25483049
Metab Eng. 2015 May;29:56-65
pubmed: 25732624
Bioresour Technol. 2016 Jan;200:780-8
pubmed: 26580895
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016 Mar 31;9:77
pubmed: 27034715
Biotechnol Lett. 2016 Oct;38(10):1733-8
pubmed: 27311308
J Biotechnol. 2016 Sep 20;234:116-126
pubmed: 27498313
Front Microbiol. 2016 Oct 05;7:1539
pubmed: 27761130
Bioresour Technol. 2017 Apr;230:15-23
pubmed: 28135603
Bioresour Technol. 2017 Dec;245(Pt B):1507-1519
pubmed: 28642053
Front Microbiol. 2017 Jun 13;8:1032
pubmed: 28659876
Metab Eng. 2017 Sep;43(Pt A):29-36
pubmed: 28782693
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Mar;102(6):2509-2523
pubmed: 29423634
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2018 Dec;38(8):1230-1243
pubmed: 29764205