Radiolabelled choline versus PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer restaging: a meta-analysis.

PET PSA PSMA choline positron emission tomography prostate

Journal

American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 2160-8407
Titre abrégé: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101564121

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 08 03 2019
accepted: 12 04 2019
entrez: 30 5 2019
pubmed: 30 5 2019
medline: 30 5 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Both radiolabelled choline and prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) could be used in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (BRPCa). We aimed to perform a meta-analysis about the head-to-head comparison of detection rate (DR) between these methods in BRPCa. A comprehensive literature search of studies listed in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases through October 2018 and regarding the head-to-head comparison of DR between radiolabelled choline and PSMA PET/CT in BRPCa was carried out. Overall pooled DR was calculated on a per patient-based analysis; subgroup analyses taking into account different prostate-specific antigen (PSA) cut-off values were performed. Five studies (257 BRPCa patients) were included. The meta-analysis provided the following overall DR: 56% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 37-75%] for radiolabelled choline PET/CT and 78% (95% CI: 70-84%) for radiolabelled PSMA PET/CT. Significant difference of DR was found only in patients with PSA ≤ 1 ng/ml [the DR of radiolabelled choline and PSMA PET/CT were 27% (95% CI: 17-39%) and 54% (95% CI: 43-65%), respectively]. Radiolabelled PSMA PET/CT proved to be clearly superior in detecting BRPCa lesions at low PSA levels (≤ 1 ng/ml) when compared to radiolabelled choline PET/CT. On the other hand, the superiority of radiolabelled PSMA PET/CT was less evident in patients with PSA > 1 ng/ml. More studies and in particular cost-effectiveness analyses comparing these imaging methods are warranted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31139496
pmc: PMC6526363

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

127-139

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None.

Références

Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Stat Med. 2006 Oct 30;25(20):3443-57
pubmed: 16345038
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36
pubmed: 22007046
Clin Nucl Med. 2013 May;38(5):305-14
pubmed: 23486334
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Jan;41(1):11-20
pubmed: 24072344
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 May;52(5):725-33
pubmed: 24310773
Clin Transl Oncol. 2014 Sep;16(9):770-5
pubmed: 24647843
J Nucl Med. 2015 Aug;56(8):1185-90
pubmed: 26112024
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jan;43(1):55-69
pubmed: 26450693
Clin Nucl Med. 2016 Jul;41(7):515-21
pubmed: 26975008
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jul;43(8):1410-7
pubmed: 26993315
Ann Nucl Med. 2016 Jul;30(6):385-92
pubmed: 27173771
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):926-937
pubmed: 27363387
Nucl Med Commun. 2016 Dec;37(12):1223-1231
pubmed: 27551835
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jan;44(1):92-101
pubmed: 27557844
Front Oncol. 2016 Nov 09;6:225
pubmed: 27882307
Molecules. 2017 Mar 24;22(4):
pubmed: 28338640
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Sep;44(10):1751-1776
pubmed: 28409220
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Sep;4(5):686-693
pubmed: 28753806
Curr Radiopharm. 2018;11(1):4-13
pubmed: 29090673
Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 14;8(67):111073-111083
pubmed: 29340038
JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):388-396
pubmed: 29362800
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Mar;63(1):19-28
pubmed: 29383928
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Mar;63(1):7-18
pubmed: 29521482
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2018 Oct;70(5):462-478
pubmed: 29664244
Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2018;2(1):9
pubmed: 29782606
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Nov;45(12):2035-2044
pubmed: 29922948
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Oct;16(5):385-391
pubmed: 29937067
Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;27(2):138-145
pubmed: 29937163
World J Urol. 2018 Jul 12;:null
pubmed: 30003375
Urol Clin North Am. 2018 Aug;45(3):481-487
pubmed: 30031467
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2018 Sep - Oct;37(5):302-314
pubmed: 30139594
F1000Res. 2018 Aug 24;7:
pubmed: 30467517
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):e696-e708
pubmed: 30507436
Prostate. 2019 Apr;79(5):454-461
pubmed: 30549066
Eur J Clin Invest. 2019 Mar;49(3):e13063
pubmed: 30580449
Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Jan 08;11:1756287218815793
pubmed: 30671137

Auteurs

Giorgio Treglia (G)

Clinic of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona and Lugano, Switzerland.
Health Technology Assessment Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.

Ricardo Pereira Mestre (R)

Clinic of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Matteo Ferrari (M)

Clinic of Urology, Regional Hospital of Bellinzona, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Davide G Bosetti (DG)

Clinic of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Mariarosa Pascale (M)

Clinical Trial Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Eleni Oikonomou (E)

Clinic of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Sara De Dosso (S)

Clinic of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Fernando Jermini (F)

Clinic of Urology, Regional Hospital of Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale Lugano, Switzerland.

John O Prior (JO)

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland.

Enrico Roggero (E)

Clinic of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Luca Giovanella (L)

Clinic of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona and Lugano, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH