Donkey pericardium compares favorably with commercial xenopericardia used in the manufacture of transcatheter heart valves.
Animals
Aortic Valve
/ surgery
Biocompatible Materials
/ chemistry
Biomechanical Phenomena
Bioprosthesis
Cattle
Collagen
/ analysis
Elasticity
Equidae
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Heart Valves
/ surgery
Horses
Materials Testing
Pericardium
/ chemistry
Swine
Tensile Strength
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
collagen architecture
donkey pericardium
tissue thickness
transcatheter heart valve
Journal
Artificial organs
ISSN: 1525-1594
Titre abrégé: Artif Organs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802778
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
13
02
2019
revised:
18
04
2019
accepted:
21
05
2019
pubmed:
30
5
2019
medline:
23
2
2020
entrez:
30
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has gained considerable acceptance in the past decade due to its lower risks than conventional open-heart surgery. However, the deformation and delamination of the leaflets during the crimping procedure have raised questions about the durability and long-term serviceability of the pericardium tissue from which the leaflets are made. The collagen architecture, wall thickness and mechanical properties of donkey pericardium were investigated to assess its suitability as an alternative material for the manufacture of heart valves. Coupons sampled from different locations of donkey pericardium were investigated. Bovine, equine, and porcine pericardium specimens served as controls. The donkey pericardium had a similar surface morphology to that of the control pericardia except for the wavy topology on both the fibrous and serous sides. The average thickness of donkey pericardium (ca. 120 µm) was significantly lower than that from bovine (375 µm) and equine (410 µm), but slightly higher than that from porcine (99 µm) specimens. The interlaced wavy collagen bundles in the pericardium were composed of collagen fibers about 100 nm in diameter. This unique structure ensures that the donkey pericardium has a comparable ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and a much higher failure strain than the commercial pericardia used for the manufacture of heart valves. The donkey pericardium has an organized wavy collagen bundle architecture similar to that of bovine pericardium and has a satisfactory UTS and high failure strain. The thin and strong donkey pericardium might be a good candidate valve leaflet material for TAVI.
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Collagen
9007-34-5
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
976-987Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : MOP 106555
Pays : Canada
Organisme : Fonds de Recherche en Chirurgie Vasculaire of the CHU de Québec
Organisme : Bourses de la Fondation du CHU de Quebec aux Etudiants
Organisme : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ID : 262258-2011
Organisme : Health Research
Informations de copyright
© 2019 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Chambers J. Prosthetic heart valves. Int J Clin Pract. 2014;68:1227-30.
Jana S, Lerman A. Bioprinting a cardiac valve. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33:1503-21.
Bezuidenhout D, Williams DF, Zilla P. Polymeric heart valves for surgical implantation, catheter-based technologies and heart assist devices. Biomaterials. 2015;36:6-25.
Dvir D, Webb JG. Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation for patients with degenerative surgical bioprosthetic valves. Circ J. 2015;79:695-703.
Páez JG, Herrero EJ, Rocha A, Martín-Maestro M, Castillo-Olivares J, Millaní I, et al. The telescoping suture-Part II: a novel method to improve the mechanical behavior of a new biomaterial: Ostrich pericardium. J Biomater. Appl. 2002;17:105-23.
Choi HS, Vito R. Two-dimensional stress-strain relationship for canine pericardium. J Biomech Eng. 1990;112:153-9.
Guidoin R, Reed RR, Lagaude A, Bes TM, Li B, Klein J, et al. Can marine mammals be a reliable source for the manufacture of prosthetic heart valves for percutaneous surgery? J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2012;22:113-26.
Loke WK, Khor E. Validation of the shrinkage temperature of animal tissue for bioprosthetic heart valve application by differential scanning calorimetry. Biomaterials 1995;16:251-8.
Neethling W, Cooper S, Van Den Heever J, Hough J, Hodge A. Evaluation of kangaroo pericardium as an alternative substitute for reconstructive cardiac surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;43:301-6.
Kvidal P, Bergström R, Hörte L-G, Ståhle E. Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:747-56.
Dvir D, Barbanti M, Tan J, Webb JG. Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation for patients with degenerative surgical bioprosthetic valves. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2014;39:7-27.
Piazza N, Bleiziffer S, Brockmann G, Hendrick R, Deutsch M-A, Opitz A, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for failing surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve: from concept to clinical application and evaluation (part 2). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:733-42.
Davidson MJ, White JK, Baim DS. Percutaneous therapies for valvular heart disease. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2006;15:123-9.
Berlin DB, Davidson MJ, Schoen FJ. The power of disruptive technological innovation: transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Biomed Mater Res B-Appl Biomater. 2015;103:1709-15.
Jalal Z, Galmiche L, Beloin C, Boudjemline Y. Impact of percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation procedural steps on leaflets histology and mechanical behaviour: an in vitro study. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;109:465-75.
Munnelly AE, Cochrane L, Leong J, Vyavahare NR. Porcine vena cava as an alternative to bovine pericardium in bioprosthetic percutaneous heart valves. Biomaterials 2012;33:1-8.
Guidoin R, Mao J, Zegdi R, Lin J, How D, Philippe E, et al. Transcatheter heart valve crimping and expansion: commentary. J Med Surg Pathol. 2017;2:1000144.
Chen S, Xu LI, Liu Y, Li Q, Wang D, Wang X, et al. Donkey pericardium as an alternative bioprosthetic heart valve material. Artif Organs. 2013;37:248-55.
Ali M, Baber M, Hussain T, Awan F, Nadeem A. The contribution of donkeys to human health. Equine Vet J. 2014;46:766-7.
Pilla R, Dapra V, Zecconi A, Piccinini R. Hygienic and health characteristics of donkey milk during a follow-up study. J. Dairy Res. 2010;77:392-7.
Gauvin R, Marinov G, Mehri Y, Klein J, Li B, Larouche D, et al. A comparative study of bovine and porcine pericardium to highlight their potential advantages to manufacture percutaneous cardiovascular implants. J Biomater Appl. 2013;28:552-65.
Guidoin R, Bes TM, Cianciulli TF, Klein J, Li B, Gauvin R, et al. Cuspal dehiscence at a post and along the stent cloth in a bovine pericardium heart valve implanted for seven years. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2012;22:95-111.
Mao J, Wang Y, Philippe E, Cianciulli T, Vesely I, How D, et al. Microstructural alterations owing to handling of bovine pericardium to manufacture bioprosthetic heart valves: a potential risk for cusp dehiscence. Morphologie. 2017;101:77-87.
Magalhaes H, Guffi M, Soutello A, Richter I, Santos J, Alliaga P, et al. HP bovine pericardial cardiac valve: multicentric study-7 year. Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil: HP Bio, 2010.
Hammer PE, Pedro J. Guidelines for sizing pericardium for aortic valve leaflet grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:e25-7.
Manji RA, Lee W, Cooper DK. Xenograft bioprosthetic heart valves: past, present and future. Int J Surg. 2015;23:280-4.
Manji RA, Ekser B, Menkis AH, Cooper DK. Bioprosthetic heart valves of the future. Xenotransplantation 2014;21:1-10.
Singhal P, Luk A, Butany J. Bioprosthetic heart valves: impact of implantation on biomaterials. ISRN Biomaterials. 2013;2013:1-14.
Aguiari P, Fiorese M, Iop L, Gerosa G, Bagno A. Mechanical testing of pericardium for manufacturing prosthetic heart valves. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22:72-84.
Sacks MS, Chuong CC, More R. Collagen fiber architecture of bovine pericardium. ASAIO J. 1994;40:M632-7.
Berbacca G, Fisher A, Wilkinson R, Mackay T, Wheatley D. Calcification and stress distribution in bovine pericardial heart valves. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26:959-66.
Zegdi R, Ciobotaru V, Noghin M, Sleilaty G, Lafont A, Latrémouille C, et al. Is it reasonable to treat all calcified stenotic aortic valves with a valved stent?: results from a human anatomic study in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:579-84.
Mirnajafi A, Raymer J, Scott MJ, Sacks MS. The effects of collagen fiber orientation on the flexural properties of pericardial heterograft biomaterials. Biomaterials 2005;26:795-804.
Khoffi F, Heim F. Mechanical degradation of biological heart valve tissue induced by low diameter crimping: an early assessment. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;44:71-5.
Braga-Vilela AS, Pimentel ER, Marangoni S, Toyama MH, de Campos VB. Extracellular matrix of porcine pericardium: biochemistry and collagen architecture. J Membr Biol. 2008;221:15-25.
Shoulders MD, Raines RT. Collagen structure and stability. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:929-58.
Soares JS, Feaver KR, Zhang W, Kamensky D, Aggarwal A, Sacks MS. Biomechanical behavior of bioprosthetic heart valve heterograft tissues: characterization, simulation, and performance. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2016;7:309-51.
Pereira CA, Michael Lee R, Haberer SA. Effect of alternative crosslinking methods on the low strain rate viscoelastic properties of bovine pericardial bioprosthetic material. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24:345-61.
Simionescu D, Simionescu A, Deac R. Mapping of glutaraldehyde-treated bovine pericardium and tissue selection for bioprosthetic heart valves. J Biomed Mater Res. 1993;27:697-704.
Hiester ED, Sacks MS. Optimal bovine pericardial tissue selection sites. I. Fiber architecture and tissue thickness measurements. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;39:207-14.
Hiester ED, Sacks MS. Optimal bovine pericardial tissue selection sites. II. Cartographic analysis. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;39:215-21.