Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review.
drug survival
golimumab
real-world evidence (RWE)
rheumatology
treatment persistence
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 05 2019
28 05 2019
Historique:
entrez:
31
5
2019
pubmed:
31
5
2019
medline:
2
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To summarise real-world data from studies reporting golimumab persistence in European immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) populations and to report pooled estimates. Systematic literature review. Relevant literature was identified through searching Medline and Embase via Ovid as well as the conference databases of European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology-Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals. We screened records using predefined patients, interventions, comparators, outcomes and study design criteria. Eligible studies included reports of persistence among adult IMRD patients in Europe receiving treatment with subcutaneous golimumab. Clinical trials, randomised controlled trials, literature reviews, editorials, guidelines and studies with <20 patients receiving golimumab were excluded. Following double screening by two independent reviewers, 27 studies out of 578 identified records were selected for inclusion and subsequent data extraction. Persistence was most commonly reported at 12and 24 months; hence, pooled persistence estimates were calculated for these two time points and reported according to indication. Persistence ranged between 58.1% (psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients regardless of treatment line) and 75.7% (biological-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients) at 12 months; at 24 months, the range was 43% (axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) patients regardless of treatment line) and 69.6% (biological-naïve PsA patients). On the basis of data from 12 studies, persistence with golimumab treatment was either significantly higher or not significantly different from other tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Golimumab persistence at 24 months approximates 50%, with a lower persistence among AxSpA (43%) patients. However, as the number of studies in these populations was low, they warrant further research. In 12 studies comparing various TNFi treatments, golimumab was shown to have significantly better or equal persistence to its comparators.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31142529
pii: bmjopen-2018-027456
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027456
pmc: PMC6549706
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Antirheumatic Agents
0
golimumab
91X1KLU43E
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e027456Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: KL, MD and NJ are employees of ICON PLC. FC, MG, SS and AK are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme, Lucerne, Switzerland. SK and CMB are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Références
J Rheumatol Suppl. 1996 Mar;44:102-6
pubmed: 8833065
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 Mar-Apr;36(2):254-262
pubmed: 29148406
J Rheumatol. 2002 Aug;29(8):1631-8
pubmed: 12180721
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Apr 07;11:719-729
pubmed: 28435230
Scand J Immunol. 2010 Aug;72(2):75-85
pubmed: 20618765
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Sep-Oct;35(5):804-809
pubmed: 28770712
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Apr;74(4):757-61
pubmed: 25387477
Value Health. 2008 Jan-Feb;11(1):44-7
pubmed: 18237359
J Rheumatol. 1992 Dec;19(12):1874-84
pubmed: 1294734
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015 Mar-Apr;33(2):201-8
pubmed: 25664404
J Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;43(2):298-306
pubmed: 26669912
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):978-991
pubmed: 28087505
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Aug 21;12:1483-1503
pubmed: 30174415
Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;21(2):422-430
pubmed: 29082659
Scand J Rheumatol. 2017 Sep;46(5):359-363
pubmed: 27931158
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Jun;68(6):744-52
pubmed: 26474452
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 18;7(9):e015872
pubmed: 28928177
Clin Ther. 2013 Nov;35(11):1850-61.e1
pubmed: 24156821
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Sep;73(9):1689-94
pubmed: 24748630
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020 Jan-Feb;38(1):107-114
pubmed: 31287400
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Aug;64(8):2504-17
pubmed: 22378566
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jul;24(8 Spec No.):SP338-SP345
pubmed: 30020745
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017 Jul-Aug;35(4):623-629
pubmed: 28598774
Acta Reumatol Port. 2017 Feb 18;42(Apr-Jun):141-149
pubmed: 28371797
Rheumatol Int. 2016 Jul;36(7):987-95
pubmed: 26780533
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Nov;58(11):3402-12
pubmed: 18975305
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Oct;67(10):2702-12
pubmed: 26139307
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 May;54(5):792-7
pubmed: 25288786
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Mar;55(3):523-34
pubmed: 26490106
Drug Dev Res. 2014 Nov;75 Suppl 1:S38-41
pubmed: 25381973
Int J Rheumatol. 2013;2013:764518
pubmed: 24307903
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):789-96
pubmed: 19066176
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):960-977
pubmed: 28264816
Open Access Rheumatol. 2009 Dec 04;1:163-178
pubmed: 27789989
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Jun;46(6):732-739
pubmed: 28010883
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Aug;47(1):108-114
pubmed: 28216195
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Mar;75(3):499-510
pubmed: 26644232
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Dec;37(12):2049-2058
pubmed: 28975392
Lancet. 2009 Jul 18;374(9685):210-21
pubmed: 19560810