Engaging primary care physicians in system change - an interpretive qualitative study in a remote and rural health region in Northern British Columbia, Canada.
community health planning/methods
community-institutional relations
physician engagement
primary care
qualitative methods
rural health services
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 05 2019
28 05 2019
Historique:
entrez:
31
5
2019
pubmed:
31
5
2019
medline:
2
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To describe how physicians were engaged in primary healthcare system change in a remote and rural Canadian health authority. A qualitative interpretive study based on a hermeneutic approach. 34 transcribed in-depth interviews with physicians and administrators relevant to physician engagement were purposively sampled from a larger data set of 239 interviews gathered over a 3-year period from seven communities engaged in primary healthcare transformation. Interviews were coded and analysed interpretively to develop common themes. This research is part of a larger study, Partnering for Change I, which investigated the efforts of Northern Health, a rural regional health authority in British Columbia, to transform its healthcare system to one grounded in primary care with a focus on interdisciplinary teams. It reports how physician engagement was accomplished during the first 3 years of the study. Interviews with 34 individuals with direct involvement and experience in the processes of physician engagement. These included 10 physicians, three Regional Executives, 18 Primary Healthcare coordinators and three Division of Family Practice leads. Three major interconnected themes that depicted the process of engagement were identified: working through tensions constructively, drawing on structures for engagement and facilitating relationships. Physician engagement was recognised as a priority by Northern Health in its efforts to create system change. This was facilitated by the creation of Divisions of Family Practice that provided a structure for dialogue and facilitated a common voice for physicians. Divisions helped to build trust between various groups through allowing constructive conversations to surface and deal with tensions. Local context mattered. Flexibility in working from local priorities was a critical part of developing relationships that facilitated the design and implementation of system reform.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31142534
pii: bmjopen-2018-028395
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028395
pmc: PMC6549631
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e028395Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : MOP 114987
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb;52(1):291-312
pubmed: 27910099
Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Jan-Mar;38(1):9-19
pubmed: 22269782
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502
pubmed: 16202000
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 30;(6):CD005314
pubmed: 26123126
BMJ. 1992 Jan 25;304(6821):231-4
pubmed: 1739799
Healthc Q. 2012;15 Spec No:51-5
pubmed: 24863118
J Health Organ Manag. 2014;28(1):41-61
pubmed: 24783665
J Health Organ Manag. 2019 Mar 28;33(2):126-140
pubmed: 30950306
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 1;12(1):98
pubmed: 28764728
BMJ. 2018 May 17;361:k2014
pubmed: 29773537
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2016 Jul 4;29(3):264-81
pubmed: 27397749
Aust J Rural Health. 2009 Feb;17(1):58-64
pubmed: 19161503
Health Place. 2009 Mar;15(1):284-90
pubmed: 18617433
Int J Health Serv. 2019 Jan;49(1):51-67
pubmed: 30335552
CMAJ. 2016 Apr 5;188(6):E100
pubmed: 26927974