Detection and Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms in the Posterior Fossa by Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography - Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Computed tomography angiography
digital subtraction angiography
posterior fossa aneurysms
posterior fossa bleed
Journal
Asian journal of neurosurgery
ISSN: 1793-5482
Titre abrégé: Asian J Neurosurg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101564712
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
31
5
2019
pubmed:
31
5
2019
medline:
31
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Posterior fossa hemorrhages are not so frequent but as posterior cranial fossa space is narrow and has many vital structures, even a small amount of bleed can lead to compression of brain stem and serious consequences. Identification and planning management of cause of bleed requires angiogram. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) being invasive modality but is gold standard, so noninvasive computed tomography angiography (CTA) is compared to detect cause of bleed in the posterior fossa in this study. From January 2017 to October 2018, all patients with posterior fossa bleed who underwent CTA and DSA for evaluation were compared regarding identification of aneurysm as cause of bleed. A total of 49 patients were evaluated in this study during study duration, of which 26 (53%) were male and 23 (47%) were female. Out of 49 patients evaluated, 47 patients had aneurysms detected on DSA. Of 25 patients who underwent both procedures, 23 patients had aneurysms, and correct diagnosis was made with CTA in 24 out of 25 aneurysms. One aneurysm missed by CTA was close to bony structure. With advancement of CTA technology, sensitivity of detecting intracranial aneurysms has increased to >96%. The overall sensitivity in detecting aneurysms is 96% with sensitivity in detecting aneurysms >4 mm being 100%. The sensitivity of CTA for smaller sized aneurysms is low which is attributed partially to lower spatial resolution of CT compared to DSA. CTA is a simple, fast, and noninvasive imaging modality that can be used to detect and characterize intracranial aneurysms in the posterior fossa.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31143268
doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_290_18
pii: AJNS-14-491
pmc: PMC6516002
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
491-498Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest.
Références
Lancet. 1999 Nov 6;354(9190):1594-7
pubmed: 10560674
Neurosurgery. 1999 Dec;45(6):1315-20; discussion 1320-2
pubmed: 10598698
Acta Radiol. 2000 May;41(3):204-10
pubmed: 10866072
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Jun-Jul;27(6):1332-7
pubmed: 16775292
Br J Neurosurg. 2008 Feb;22(1):71-8
pubmed: 18224524
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(4):901-7
pubmed: 19066008
J Med Life. 2010 Jan-Mar;3(1):26-35
pubmed: 20302194
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):455-61
pubmed: 20729022
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2010 Dec;54(6):526-33
pubmed: 21199429
Ann Neurol. 2011 Apr;69(4):646-54
pubmed: 21391230
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jan;81(1):118-22
pubmed: 21632193
Clin Radiol. 2013 Jan;68(1):e15-20
pubmed: 23142024
Acta Radiol. 2014 Sep;55(7):840-6
pubmed: 24065201
Neuroradiol J. 2010 Mar;23(1):55-61
pubmed: 24148334
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2015 Sep;17(3):185-93
pubmed: 26523254