Suplatast tosilate in patients with interstitial cystitis: Efficacy and treatment possibilities, with suggestions for future assessments.
Administration, Oral
Adult
Aged
Arylsulfonates
/ administration & dosage
Cystitis, Interstitial
/ diagnosis
Cystoscopy
Cytokines
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Japan
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Selection
Placebo Effect
Severity of Illness Index
Sulfonium Compounds
/ administration & dosage
Th2 Cells
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Bladder
/ pathology
diagnostic hydrodistention
interstitial cystitis
placebo effect
suplatast tosilate
Journal
International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association
ISSN: 1442-2042
Titre abrégé: Int J Urol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9440237
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
18
03
2019
accepted:
18
03
2019
entrez:
31
5
2019
pubmed:
31
5
2019
medline:
16
7
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Suplatast tosilate, a Th2 cytokine inhibitor, was predicted to relieve interstitial cystitis symptoms. Four studies with suplatast tosilate in Japanese interstitial cystitis patients have been conducted: a single-arm clinical study, a phase II dose-ranging trial, a phase III trial with placebo, and a second phase PIII trial with placebo. Treatment efficacy was observed in the first two studies; however, in the phase PIII trials, no significant difference in interstitial cystitis symptom score changes was observed between suplatast tosilate and placebo. We summarized these four studies to investigate factors causing the difference in observed efficacy. Placebo effects in the first two studies and differences regarding study design between the four studies were considered to be possible factors. Therefore, placebo effects were investigated by comparing interstitial cystitis symptom score changes, and the study designs were compared to investigate the effects on observed efficacy. Interstitial cystitis symptom score changes in the phase PII treatment groups increased in a dose-dependent manner and showed an almost linear relationship with interstitial cystitis symptom score changes observed in placebo groups of 2 phase PIII studies. A major difference regarding the phase PIII study design was the use of diagnostic hydrodistention. Diagnostic hydrodistention and its washout period were applied only in the phase PIII trials. Comparison of interstitial cystitis symptom score changes suggested that the placebo effect was very small. Use of diagnostic hydrodistention was considered to be a major difference in the population characteristics of the studies and may have resulted in different observed efficacies. Diagnostic hydrodistention, which potentially influences the treatment effect, is probably not essential for trials of suplatast in interstitial cystitis patients.
Substances chimiques
Arylsulfonates
0
Cytokines
0
Sulfonium Compounds
0
suplatast tosilate
C9J89787U1
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4-11Subventions
Organisme : Taiho pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
Editorial material and organization © 2019 The Japanese Urological Association. Copyright of individual abstracts remains with the authors.