Clinical and design factors influence the survivorship of custom flange acetabular components.
Acetabulum
/ diagnostic imaging
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
/ instrumentation
Bone Screws
Female
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis, Hip
/ diagnostic imaging
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Reoperation
/ statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Acetabular revision
Custom flange acetabular component
Pelvicdefects
Journal
The bone & joint journal
ISSN: 2049-4408
Titre abrégé: Bone Joint J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101599229
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
entrez:
1
6
2019
pubmed:
31
5
2019
medline:
14
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Custom flange acetabular components (CFACs) are a patient-specific option for addressing large acetabular defects at revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), but patient and implant characteristics that affect survivorship remain unknown. This study aimed to identify patient and design factors related to survivorship. A retrospective review of 91 patients who underwent revision THA using 96 CFACs was undertaken, comparing features between radiologically failed and successful cases. Patient characteristics (demographic, clinical, and radiological) and implant features (design characteristics and intraoperative features) were collected. There were 74 women and 22 men; their mean age was 62 years (31 to 85). The mean follow-up was 24.9 months (sd 27.6; 0 to 116). Two sets of statistical analyses were performed: 1) univariate analyses (Pearson's chi-squared and independent-samples Student's Radiological failure and revision rates were 23% and 12.5%, respectively. Revisions were undertaken at a mean of 25.1 months (sd 26.4) postoperatively. Patients with radiological failure were younger at the time of the initial procedure, were less likely to have a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis (OA), were more likely to have had ischial screws in previous surgery, had fewer ischial screw holes in their CFAC design, and had more proximal ischial fixation. Random forest analysis identified the age of the patient and the number of locking and non-locking screws used for inclusion in subsequent bivariable logistic regression, but only age (odds ratio 0.93 per year) was found to be significant. We identified both patient and design features predictive of CFAC survivorship. We found a higher rate of failure in younger patients, those whose primary diagnosis was not OA, and those with more proximal ischial fixation or fewer ischial fixation options. Cite this article:
Identifiants
pubmed: 31146558
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1455.R1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM