Diagnostic accuracy of intracoronary optical coherence tomography-derived fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity.
Journal
EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1969-6213
Titre abrégé: EuroIntervention
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101251040
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Jun 2019
20 Jun 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
31
5
2019
medline:
31
7
2019
entrez:
1
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A novel method for computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was developed recently. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a new OCT-based FFR (OFR) computational approach, using wire-based FFR as the reference standard. Patients who underwent both OCT and FFR prior to intervention were analysed. The lumen of the interrogated vessel and the ostia of the side branches were automatically delineated and used to compute OFR. Bifurcation fractal laws were applied to correct the change in reference lumen size due to the step-down phenomenon. OFR was compared with FFR, both using a cut-off value of 0.80 to define ischaemia. Computational analysis was performed in 125 vessels from 118 patients. Average FFR was 0.80±0.09. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for OFR to identify FFR ≤0.80 was 90% (95% CI: 84-95), 87% (95% CI: 77-94), 92% (95% CI: 82-97), 92% (95% CI: 82-97), and 88% (95% CI: 77-95), respectively. The AUC was higher for OFR than minimal lumen area (0.93 [95% CI: 0.87-0.97] versus 0.80 [95% CI: 0.72-0.86], p=0.002). Average OFR analysis time was 55±23 seconds for each OCT pullback. Intra- and inter-observer variability in OFR analysis was 0.00±0.02 and 0.00±0.03, respectively. OFR is a novel and fast method allowing assessment of flow-limiting coronary stenosis without pressure wire and induced hyperaemia. The good diagnostic accuracy and low observer variability bear the potential of improved integration of intracoronary imaging and physiological assessment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31147309
pii: EIJ-D-19-00182
doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00182
pmc: PMC8130381
mid: NIHMS1699415
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
189-197Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL143484
Pays : United States
Références
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):564-74
pubmed: 25819180
EuroIntervention. 2017 May 15;13(1):115-123
pubmed: 28067200
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007107
pubmed: 29555835
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024-2035
pubmed: 27712739
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087
pubmed: 29101020
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 6;7(14):
pubmed: 29980523
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 19;379(3):250-259
pubmed: 29785878
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Feb;16(2):177-89
pubmed: 25227268
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Sep 12;70(11):1379-1402
pubmed: 28882237
EuroIntervention. 2012 Mar;7(11):1310-6
pubmed: 22433194
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 15;120(10):1772-1779
pubmed: 28864324
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug;9(8):
pubmed: 27502209
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jul;33(7):975-990
pubmed: 28265791
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24
pubmed: 19144937