Volumetric assessment of extracranial carotid artery aneurysms.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 05 2019
30 05 2019
Historique:
received:
06
02
2019
accepted:
03
05
2019
entrez:
1
6
2019
pubmed:
31
5
2019
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The extracranial carotid artery aneurysm (ECAA) is a rare pathology for which clinical treatment guidelines are lacking. In general, symptoms or growth of the aneurysm sac are thought to indicate intervention. ECAAs may present in a large variety of shapes and sizes, and conventional diameter measurements fail to indicate geometrical differences. Therefore, we propose a protocol to measure ECAA size by 3D volumetric assessment. The volumes of 40 ECAAs in computed tomography angiography (CTA) images were measured through manual segmentation, by two independent operators. Volumes of the entire internal carotid artery (ICA) and the ECAA were measured separately. Excellent inter- and intraoperator reliability was found for both ICA and ECAA volumes, with all intraclass correlation coefficients above 0.94. Bland-Altman analysis revealed normal differences for both inter- and intraoperator agreement. For all volumes, similarity of the segmentations was excellent. Outliers were explained by presence of intraluminal ECAA thrombus, which hampered identification of the aneurysm outer wall. These results implicate robustness of our protocol, which is designed as a step-up towards (semi)automatic volumetric measurements to monitor patients with ECAA. Future (semi)automatic volumetric assessments are recommended and such techniques can be developed and validated using the proposed protocol and manual reference segmentations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31147576
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44553-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-44553-0
pmc: PMC6542789
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8108Références
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jan;53(1):4-52
pubmed: 28081802
J Endovasc Ther. 2009 Aug;16(4):506-13
pubmed: 19702341
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):2-77.e2
pubmed: 29268916
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Aug;50(2):141-7
pubmed: 26116488
Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 May;28(4):882-6
pubmed: 24189193
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun;55(6):1618-22
pubmed: 22341576
World J Radiol. 2016 Feb 28;8(2):148-58
pubmed: 26981224
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jul;46(1):1
pubmed: 23926616
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015 Mar;157(3):361-8; discussion 368
pubmed: 25502806
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2015;2015:813696
pubmed: 26759553
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 Oct;59(5):692-698
pubmed: 25658976
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;57(1):8-93
pubmed: 30528142
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Feb;29(2):178-187.e3
pubmed: 29217411
Eur J Neurol. 2018 Oct;25(10):1285-1289
pubmed: 29904963
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2016 Apr;57(2):152-7
pubmed: 26603291
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;64(1):96-106
pubmed: 21130355