Sperm size is negatively related to relative testis size in West African riverine cichlid fishes.
Gonadosomatic index
Mating system
Pelvicachromis taeniatus
Sexual selection
Sperm competition
West African cichlids
Journal
Die Naturwissenschaften
ISSN: 1432-1904
Titre abrégé: Naturwissenschaften
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0400767
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 May 2019
30 May 2019
Historique:
received:
06
07
2018
accepted:
06
05
2019
revised:
02
05
2019
entrez:
1
6
2019
pubmed:
31
5
2019
medline:
30
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fishes show a great diversity of mating systems and fertilization mechanisms. This diversity creates an enormous potential for sperm competition. Typically, monogamous species face a low risk of sperm competition and invest less into sperm, and thus show smaller relative testis mass compared to polygamous species with high sperm competition. In cichlids, sperm competition risk is very variable. In lacustrine East African cichlids, large sperm are interpreted as an adaptation to sperm competition, as in those species sperm length correlates with sperm swimming speed. The aim of the present study was to examine variation in sperm and testis traits of substrate breeding cichlids from West African river systems and its relationship to sperm competition. Therefore, sperm traits (total sperm size, flagellum-, midpiece-, and head size) and sperm number were related to the gonadosomatic index (GSI), an indicator of sperm competition, in eight species of two large informal tribes, the chromidotilapiines and the haplotilapiines. We found significant differences between species in all examined sperm traits, sperm number, and GSI with pronounced differences between chromidotilapiines and haplotilapiines. We used a generalized least-squares approach to control for non-independence of data. GSI was positively correlated with sperm number but negatively correlated with total sperm size (also negatively with the flagellum and head size but not significantly with midpiece size). Sperm number and sperm size were negatively correlated suggesting a trade-off between sperm size and quality. Our results suggest that large sperm can evolve in species with relatively low sperm expenditure and probably in absence of high sperm competition between males.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31147792
doi: 10.1007/s00114-019-1622-0
pii: 10.1007/s00114-019-1622-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
30Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : BA 2885/2-3
Références
Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Feb 7;266(1416):263-7
pubmed: 10081163
Nature. 1999 Oct 28;401(6756):877-84
pubmed: 10553904
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):21-64
pubmed: 10740892
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 22;268(1483):2375-81
pubmed: 11703878
Biol Reprod. 2002 Jan;66(1):98-105
pubmed: 11751270
Curr Biol. 2003 Apr 29;13(9):754-7
pubmed: 12725733
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Oct 7;270(1528):2079-86
pubmed: 14561298
Curr Biol. 2004 Jan 6;14(1):44-7
pubmed: 14711413
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2005 Jan;140(1):11-7
pubmed: 15664308
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Jan;20(1):46-53
pubmed: 16701340
Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Mar 22;243(1308):181-5
pubmed: 1675796
Biol Lett. 2006 Jun 22;2(2):246-9
pubmed: 17148374
Naturwissenschaften. 2007 Jun;94(6):489-91
pubmed: 17265062
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 22;274(1609):561-8
pubmed: 17476777
Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52(5-6):439-47
pubmed: 18649256
Am Nat. 2002 Dec;160(6):712-26
pubmed: 18707460
Am Nat. 1997 May;149(5):933-54
pubmed: 18811256
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Nov 25;8:319
pubmed: 19032741
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 22;276(1659):1175-81
pubmed: 19129098
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jan 27;106(4):1128-32
pubmed: 19164576
Biol Lett. 2010 Dec 23;6(6):797-9
pubmed: 20484233
Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):619-24
pubmed: 2052088
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 29;108(13):5325-30
pubmed: 21402912
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989 Dec 21;326(1233):119-57
pubmed: 2575770
Evolution. 1997 Jun;51(3):937-945
pubmed: 28568571
J Theor Biol. 1972 Sep;36(3):529-53
pubmed: 5080448
J Theor Biol. 1982 May 21;96(2):281-94
pubmed: 7121030
Nature. 1995 May 11;375(6527):109
pubmed: 7753164
Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Sep 22;253(1338):245-54
pubmed: 8234363
Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Sep 22;253(1338):255-62
pubmed: 8234364
J Theor Biol. 1996 May 21;180(2):141-50
pubmed: 8763365