Pig Model to Test Tissue-Engineered Skin.


Journal

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
ISSN: 1940-6029
Titre abrégé: Methods Mol Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9214969

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
entrez: 1 6 2019
pubmed: 31 5 2019
medline: 27 2 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tissue engineering of skin is a field with high research activities and major importance for wound healing, especially following burn injuries. Animal models enable to test tissue-engineered skin as well as different types of cells in a realistic setting. Although there are several challenges in working with pigs, it is a good model because of its similarity to the human skin and a comparable wound regeneration. Here, we explain our routinely used methods for using pig models to test tissue-engineered skin in burn injuries.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31148092
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9473-1_19
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

239-249

Références

Shevchenko RV, James SL, James SE (2010) A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction. J R Soc Interface 7:229–258
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0403
Huang S, Fu X (2011) Tissue-engineered skin: bottleneck or breakthrough. Int J Burn Trauma 1(1):1–10
Finnerty CC et al (2016) Hypertrophic scarring: the greatest unmet challenge following burn injury. Lancet 388(10052):1427–1436
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31406-4
Saaiq M, Zaib S, Ahmad S (2012) Early excision and grafting versus delayed excision and grating of deep thermal burns up to 40% total body surface area: a comparison of outcome. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 25(3):143–147
Ayaz M et al (2014) Early Excision and grafting versus delayed skin grafting in burns covering less than 15% of total body surface area; a non- randomized clinical trial. Bull Emerg Trauma 2(4):141–145
Herndon DN et al (1989) A comparison of conservative versus early excision. Therapies in severely burned patients. Ann Surg 209(5):547–553
doi: 10.1097/00000658-198905000-00006
Kapp MB (2006) Ethical and legal issues in research involving human subjects: do you want a piece of me? J Clin Pathol 59(4):335–339
doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.030957
Rheinwald JG, Green H (1977) Epidermal growth factor and the multiplication of cultured human epidermal keratinocytes. Nature 265(5593):421–424
doi: 10.1038/265421a0
Sullivan TP et al (2001) The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 9(2):66–76
doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00066.x
Ignacio G, El-Amin I, Mendenhall V (2016) Animal models for wound healing. in Skin tissue engineering and regenerative medicine eds. Albanna M, JH Holmes IV, New York: Academic Press/Elsevier 387–400
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-801654-1.00019-X
Meyer W, Schwarz R, Neurand K (1978) The skin of domestic mammals as a model for the human skin, with special reference to the domestic pig. Curr Probl Dermatol 7:39–52
doi: 10.1159/000401274
Heinrich W et al (1971) Isolation and characterization of the large cyanogen bromide peptides from the alpha1- and alpha2-chains of pig skin collagen. FEBS Lett 16(1):63–67
doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(71)80687-7
Morris GM, Hopewell JW (1990) Epidermal cell kinetics of the pig: a review. Cell Tissue Kinet 23(4):271–282
National Research Council (1996) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. ISBN: 0309132622
Branski LK et al (2008) A porcine model of full-thickness burn, excision and skin autografting. Burns 34(8):1119–1127
doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.03.013
Lammers G et al (2011) An overview of methods for the in vivo evaluation of tissue-engineered skin constructs. Tissue Eng 17(1):33–55
doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0473
Verhaegen PD et al (2009) Differences in collagen architecture between keloid, hypertrophic scar, normotrophic scar, and normal skin: an objective histopathological analysis. Wound Repair Regen 17(5):649–656
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00533.x
Swindle MM, Smith AC (2007) Swine in the laboratory: surgery, anesthesia, imaging, and experimental techniques, vol 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. ISBN: 9781466553477
doi: 10.1201/9781420009156
Middelkoop E et al (2004) Porcine wound model for skin substitution and burn treatment. Biomaterials 25(9):1559–1567
doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00502-7
Abdullahi A, Amini-Nik S, Jeschke MG (2014) Animal models in burn research. Cell Mol Life Sci 71(17):3241–3255
doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1612-5
Wachtel TL, et al. (1972) Determining the surface areas of miniature swine and domestic swine by geometric design – a comparative study. USAARL Report, 73-3
Braziulis E et al (2011) Skingineering I: engineering porcine dermo-epidermal skin analogues for autologous transplantation in a large animal model. Pediatr Surg Int 27:241–247
doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2777-0

Auteurs

Christian Tapking (C)

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch and Shriners Hospitals for Children®-Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA.
Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Trauma Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Daniel Popp (D)

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch and Shriners Hospitals for Children®-Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA.
Division of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Ludwik K Branski (LK)

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch and Shriners Hospitals for Children®-Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA. lubransk@utmb.edu.
Division of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria. lubransk@utmb.edu.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH