Self-Management Maintenance Inhalation Therapy With eHealth (SELFIE): Observational Study on the Use of an Electronic Monitoring Device in Respiratory Patient Care and Research.


Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 05 2019
Historique:
received: 30 01 2019
accepted: 23 03 2019
revised: 20 03 2019
entrez: 1 6 2019
pubmed: 1 6 2019
medline: 14 2 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Electronic inhalation monitoring devices (EIMDs) are available to remind patients with respiratory diseases to take their medication and register inhalations for feedback to patients and health care providers as well as for data collection in research settings. This study aimed to assess the validity as well as the patient-reported usability and acceptability of an EIMD. This observational study planned to include 21 community pharmacies in the Netherlands. Patient-reported inhalations were collected and compared to EIMD registrations to evaluate the positive predictive value of these registrations as actual patient inhalations. Patients received questionnaires on their experiences and acceptance. A convenience sample of 32 patients was included from across 18 pharmacies, and 932 medication doses were validated. Of these, 796 registrations matched with patient-reported use (true-positive, 85.4%), and 33 inhalation registrations did not match with patient-reported use (false-positive, 3.5%). The positive predictive value was 96.0%, and 103 patient-reported inhalations were not recorded in the database (false-negative, 11.1%). Overall, patients considered the EIMD to be acceptable and easy to use, but many hesitated to continue its use. Reminders and motivational messages were not appreciated by all users, and more user-tailored features in the app were desired. Patients' interaction with the device in real-world settings is critical for objective measurement of medication adherence. The positive predictive value of this EIMD was found to be acceptable. However, patients reported false-negative registrations and a desire to include more user-tailored features to increase the usability and acceptability of the EIMD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Electronic inhalation monitoring devices (EIMDs) are available to remind patients with respiratory diseases to take their medication and register inhalations for feedback to patients and health care providers as well as for data collection in research settings.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to assess the validity as well as the patient-reported usability and acceptability of an EIMD.
METHODS
This observational study planned to include 21 community pharmacies in the Netherlands. Patient-reported inhalations were collected and compared to EIMD registrations to evaluate the positive predictive value of these registrations as actual patient inhalations. Patients received questionnaires on their experiences and acceptance.
RESULTS
A convenience sample of 32 patients was included from across 18 pharmacies, and 932 medication doses were validated. Of these, 796 registrations matched with patient-reported use (true-positive, 85.4%), and 33 inhalation registrations did not match with patient-reported use (false-positive, 3.5%). The positive predictive value was 96.0%, and 103 patient-reported inhalations were not recorded in the database (false-negative, 11.1%). Overall, patients considered the EIMD to be acceptable and easy to use, but many hesitated to continue its use. Reminders and motivational messages were not appreciated by all users, and more user-tailored features in the app were desired.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients' interaction with the device in real-world settings is critical for objective measurement of medication adherence. The positive predictive value of this EIMD was found to be acceptable. However, patients reported false-negative registrations and a desire to include more user-tailored features to increase the usability and acceptability of the EIMD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31148542
pii: v21i5e13551
doi: 10.2196/13551
pmc: PMC6658221
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e13551

Informations de copyright

©Esther Kuipers, Charlotte C Poot, Michel Wensing, Niels H Chavannes, Peter AGM de Smet, Martina Teichert. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 30.05.2019.

Références

J Med Internet Res. 2008 May 15;10(2):e13
pubmed: 18487137
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2008 Feb;33(1):17-23
pubmed: 18211612
Clin Ther. 1999 Jun;21(6):1074-90; discussion 1073
pubmed: 10440628
Comput Inform Nurs. 2009 May-Jun;27(3):175-83
pubmed: 19411947
BMC Med. 2015 Mar 23;13:58
pubmed: 25857569
J Asthma. 2012 Aug;49(6):657-62
pubmed: 22741746
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 Jan;1(1):83-91
pubmed: 24229826
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 27;(11):CD010013
pubmed: 24282112
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Mar;3(3):210-9
pubmed: 25617215
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2013 Nov;30:1-10
pubmed: 24312989
J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(1):3-7
pubmed: 20086259
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Jul;104(1):53-7
pubmed: 10400839
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Apr;119(4):811-6
pubmed: 17320942
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2017 Aug 16;4(1):e000204
pubmed: 29071077
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2015 Nov 06;2(1):e000097
pubmed: 26629345
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Oct;100(4):488-91
pubmed: 9338542
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 Sep;102(3):409-13
pubmed: 9768581
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017 May;14(5):401-411
pubmed: 28434269
J Asthma. 2010 Mar;47(2):198-201
pubmed: 20170329
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Jul;104(1):22-4
pubmed: 10400834
JAMA. 2002 Nov 20;288(19):2469-75
pubmed: 12435261
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Aug;39(4):888-896
pubmed: 28597176
J Psychosom Res. 1999 Dec;47(6):555-67
pubmed: 10661603
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 05;13(4):e111
pubmed: 22155738
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 May 01;4(3):666-84
pubmed: 20513335
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Dec;134(6):1260-1268.e3
pubmed: 25062783
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Jan;80(1):1-12
pubmed: 21112244
J Asthma. 2016 Nov;53(9):948-54
pubmed: 27116540
Chest. 2002 Mar;121(3):871-6
pubmed: 11888975
J Psychosom Res. 2008 Jan;64(1):47-54
pubmed: 18157999
J Bras Pneumol. 2008 Aug;34(8):614-21
pubmed: 18797747
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May-Jun;3(3):335-49.e1-5
pubmed: 25840665
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013 Sep-Oct;1(5):446-54
pubmed: 24565615

Auteurs

Esther Kuipers (E)

Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
BENU Apotheek Zeist West, Zeist, Netherlands.

Charlotte C Poot (CC)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.

Michel Wensing (M)

Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Niels H Chavannes (NH)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.

Peter Agm de Smet (PA)

Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Martina Teichert (M)

Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH