Mitochondrial genome diversity and evolution in Branchiopoda (Crustacea).

Branchiopoda Mitochondrial genomics Mitochondrial unequal recombination Notostraca Nucleotide compositional bias Nucleotide substitution rate

Journal

Zoological letters
ISSN: 2056-306X
Titre abrégé: Zoological Lett
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101664800

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 13 12 2018
accepted: 19 05 2019
entrez: 1 6 2019
pubmed: 1 6 2019
medline: 1 6 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The crustacean class Branchiopoda includes fairy shrimps, clam shrimps, tadpole shrimps, and water fleas. Branchiopods, which are well known for their great variety of reproductive strategies, date back to the Cambrian and extant taxa can be mainly found in freshwater habitats, also including ephemeral ponds. Mitochondrial genomes of the notostracan taxa Overall, branchiopod mitogenomes share the basic structure congruent with the ancestral Pancrustacea model. On the other hand, rearrangements involving tRNAs and the control region are observed among analyzed taxa. Remarkably, an unassigned region in the Branchiopod mitogenomes appear rather well-conserved, although gene rearrangements have occurred. For the first time, it is reported a putative non-homologous recombination event involving a mitogenome, which produced a pseudogenic tRNA sequence. In addition, in line with data in the literature, we explain the higher substitution rate of Anostraca and Onychocaudata with the inferred GC substitution bias that occurred during their evolution.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The crustacean class Branchiopoda includes fairy shrimps, clam shrimps, tadpole shrimps, and water fleas. Branchiopods, which are well known for their great variety of reproductive strategies, date back to the Cambrian and extant taxa can be mainly found in freshwater habitats, also including ephemeral ponds. Mitochondrial genomes of the notostracan taxa
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, branchiopod mitogenomes share the basic structure congruent with the ancestral Pancrustacea model. On the other hand, rearrangements involving tRNAs and the control region are observed among analyzed taxa. Remarkably, an unassigned region in the
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Branchiopod mitogenomes appear rather well-conserved, although gene rearrangements have occurred. For the first time, it is reported a putative non-homologous recombination event involving a mitogenome, which produced a pseudogenic tRNA sequence. In addition, in line with data in the literature, we explain the higher substitution rate of Anostraca and Onychocaudata with the inferred GC substitution bias that occurred during their evolution.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31149346
doi: 10.1186/s40851-019-0131-5
pii: 131
pmc: PMC6537178
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

15

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA006973
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

Brief Funct Genomics. 2016 Jan;15(1):47-54
pubmed: 26117139
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Nov;69(2):320-7
pubmed: 23023207
Nature. 1997 May 15;387(6630):247
pubmed: 9153388
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 1;30(9):1312-3
pubmed: 24451623
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 4;102(1):140-5
pubmed: 15618408
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1586-91
pubmed: 17483113
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Apr;40(7):2833-45
pubmed: 22139921
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 22;7(1):4096
pubmed: 28642542
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016 May;27(3):2028-9
pubmed: 25329290
Genetics. 2015 Jul;200(3):873-90
pubmed: 25948563
Sci Rep. 2016 May 09;6:25634
pubmed: 27157299
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2016 Apr 19;1(1):323-325
pubmed: 33644370
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Apr;17(4):540-52
pubmed: 10742046
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016 Sep;27(5):3189-91
pubmed: 25693703
Mol Ecol Resour. 2019 Jan;19(1):235-244
pubmed: 30288922
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80
pubmed: 23329690
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016 Sep;27(5):3113-4
pubmed: 25707412
J Mol Evol. 1994 Feb;38(2):156-68
pubmed: 8169960
Genome Biol Evol. 2016 Sep 26;8(9):2896-2913
pubmed: 27557826
Gene. 1999 Jun 11;233(1-2):89-99
pubmed: 10375625
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jun 22;272(1569):1295-304
pubmed: 16024395
Curr Biol. 2017 Jun 19;27(12):1818-1824.e5
pubmed: 28602656
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Nov;69(2):313-9
pubmed: 22982435
Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Sep;12(5):823-33
pubmed: 7476128
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Dec;69(3):1159-71
pubmed: 23973879
PeerJ. 2013 Apr 02;1:e62
pubmed: 23638400
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Jun 16;17(6):
pubmed: 27322247
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jun 12;15:467
pubmed: 24923674
Front Genet. 2014 May 01;5:109
pubmed: 24822055
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jul;40(Web Server issue):W580-4
pubmed: 22661579
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Apr 15;27(8):1767-80
pubmed: 10101183
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Nov 08;7:214
pubmed: 17996036
J Mol Evol. 1993 Aug;37(2):137-53
pubmed: 8411203
Sci China Life Sci. 2013 May;56(5):440-52
pubmed: 23633076
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 27;7(1):4284
pubmed: 28655921
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2987-93
pubmed: 21903627
Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):539-42
pubmed: 22357727
Heredity (Edinb). 2008 Oct;101(4):301-20
pubmed: 18612321
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 May;27(5):1173-80
pubmed: 20083649
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 22;285(1885):
pubmed: 30135168
Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Jun;14(6):644-53
pubmed: 9190066
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 Mar;120:233-239
pubmed: 29258879
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Mar;29(3):1031-45
pubmed: 22049065
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 15;24(2):172-5
pubmed: 18033792
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Jun 26;7:95
pubmed: 17592650
Heredity (Edinb). 2008 May;100(5):496-505
pubmed: 18285812
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Feb 19;8:53
pubmed: 18284663
Gene. 2017 May 5;611:38-46
pubmed: 28219780
Mitochondrial DNA. 2010 Oct;21(5):170-2
pubmed: 20958225
Sci Rep. 2016 May 16;6:25725
pubmed: 27180804
Evolution. 2002 May;56(5):909-26
pubmed: 12093027
Science. 2003 Jul 25;301(5632):478
pubmed: 12881561
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Jun;29(6):1695-701
pubmed: 22319168
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1870-4
pubmed: 27004904
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2017 Dec 8;2(2):926-927
pubmed: 33474039
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jun 1;16(6):314-321
pubmed: 11369110
Zookeys. 2016 Sep 07;(615):47-60
pubmed: 27667940
Electrophoresis. 2002 Dec;23(24):4080-4
pubmed: 12481263
Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016 Sep;27(5):3579-89
pubmed: 26329687

Auteurs

Andrea Luchetti (A)

1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126 Bolgna, Italy.

Giobbe Forni (G)

1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126 Bolgna, Italy.

Alyza M Skaist (AM)

2Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.

Sarah J Wheelan (SJ)

2Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.

Barbara Mantovani (B)

1Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126 Bolgna, Italy.

Classifications MeSH