Obstacles and opportunities for monitoring ethnicity-based inequalities in maternal health care: Lessons from Mexico.
Decision Making, Organizational
Female
Health Services Needs and Demand
/ organization & administration
Healthcare Disparities
Humans
Indigenous Peoples
Maternal Health
Maternal Health Services
/ organization & administration
Mexico
Pregnancy
Qualitative Research
Quality Improvement
Socioeconomic Factors
Sustainable Development
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
20
12
2018
accepted:
14
05
2019
entrez:
1
6
2019
pubmed:
1
6
2019
medline:
6
2
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Monitoring and reducing inequalities in health care has become more relevant since the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs bring an opportunity to put the assessment of inequalities by ethnicity on the agenda of decision-makers. The objective of this qualitative study is to know how current monitoring is carried out and to identify what factors influence the process in order to incorporate indicators that allow the evaluation of inequalities by ethnicity. We conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with key informants from the health ministry, monitoring observatories, research centers, and international organizations, involved in maternal health care monitoring in Mexico. Our analysis was interpretative-phenomenological and focused on examining experiences about monitoring maternal health care in order to achieve a full picture of the current context in which it takes place and the factors that influence it. The obstacles and opportunities pointed out from the participants emerge from the limitations or advantages associated with the accuracy of evaluation, availability of information and resources, and effective management and decision-making. Technicians, coordinators, researchers or decision-makers are not only aware of the inequalities but also of its importance. However, this does not lead to political decisions permitting an indicator to be developed for monitoring it. As for opportunities, the role of international organizations and their links with the countries is crucial to carry out monitoring, due to political and technical support. The success of a monitoring system to help decision-makers reduce inequalities in health care depends not only on accurate evaluations but also on the context in which it is implemented. Understanding the operation, obstacles and opportunities for monitoring could be a key issue if the countries want to advance towards assessing inequalities and reducing health inequities with the aid of concrete policies and initiatives.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Monitoring and reducing inequalities in health care has become more relevant since the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The SDGs bring an opportunity to put the assessment of inequalities by ethnicity on the agenda of decision-makers. The objective of this qualitative study is to know how current monitoring is carried out and to identify what factors influence the process in order to incorporate indicators that allow the evaluation of inequalities by ethnicity.
METHODS
We conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with key informants from the health ministry, monitoring observatories, research centers, and international organizations, involved in maternal health care monitoring in Mexico. Our analysis was interpretative-phenomenological and focused on examining experiences about monitoring maternal health care in order to achieve a full picture of the current context in which it takes place and the factors that influence it.
RESULTS
The obstacles and opportunities pointed out from the participants emerge from the limitations or advantages associated with the accuracy of evaluation, availability of information and resources, and effective management and decision-making. Technicians, coordinators, researchers or decision-makers are not only aware of the inequalities but also of its importance. However, this does not lead to political decisions permitting an indicator to be developed for monitoring it. As for opportunities, the role of international organizations and their links with the countries is crucial to carry out monitoring, due to political and technical support.
CONCLUSIONS
The success of a monitoring system to help decision-makers reduce inequalities in health care depends not only on accurate evaluations but also on the context in which it is implemented. Understanding the operation, obstacles and opportunities for monitoring could be a key issue if the countries want to advance towards assessing inequalities and reducing health inequities with the aid of concrete policies and initiatives.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31150461
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217557
pii: PONE-D-18-36203
pmc: PMC6544348
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0217557Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Am J Public Health. 2004 Dec;94(12):2055-8
pubmed: 15569950
PLoS Med. 2014 Sep 22;11(9):e1001727
pubmed: 25243463
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 May 1;94(5):398-400
pubmed: 27147772
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016 Jun;39(6):330-340
pubmed: 27706437
PLoS Med. 2011 Nov;8(11):e1001115
pubmed: 22069378
Salud Publica Mex. 2016 Nov-Dec;58(6):606-607
pubmed: 28225936
PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001390
pubmed: 23667332
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Aug;6(8):e902-e913
pubmed: 30012271
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Aug;83(8):578-83
pubmed: 16184276
Cien Saude Colet. 2012 Mar;17(3):613-9
pubmed: 22450401
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Jan 1;97(1):59-67
pubmed: 30618466
Glob Health Action. 2018 Jan - Dec;11(sup1):1392216
pubmed: 29460696
J Health Popul Nutr. 2003 Sep;21(3):181-92
pubmed: 14717564
Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55 Suppl 2:S249-58
pubmed: 24626705
Health Policy Plan. 2016 May;31(4):444-53
pubmed: 26329891
Popul Health Metr. 2015 Feb 07;13(1):3
pubmed: 25685074
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40
pubmed: 10940958
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):e0191901
pubmed: 29385197
Glob Health Action. 2016 Feb 23;9:29030
pubmed: 26928215
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Jun 1;32(5):625-633
pubmed: 28453712
Glob Health Action. 2015 Sep 18;8:29034
pubmed: 26387506
BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1115-7
pubmed: 11337448
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Sep 1;96(9):654-659
pubmed: 30262947