Use of financial incentives and text message feedback to increase healthy food purchases in a grocery store cash back program: a randomized controlled trial.
Diet
Financial incentives
Messaging
Nutrition
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 May 2019
31 May 2019
Historique:
received:
01
10
2018
accepted:
02
05
2019
entrez:
2
6
2019
pubmed:
4
6
2019
medline:
2
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The HealthyFood (HF) program offers members up to 25% cash back monthly on healthy food purchases. In this randomized controlled trial, we tested the efficacy of financial incentives combined with text messages in increasing healthy food purchases among HF members. Members receiving the lowest (10%) cash back level were randomized to one of six arms: Arm 1 (Usual Care): 10% cash back, no weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 2: 10% cash back, generic weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 3: 10% cash back, personalized weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 4: 25% cash back, personalized weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 5: 10 + 15%NET cash back, personalized weekly text, standard monthly text; and, Arm 6: 10 + 15%NET cash back, personalized weekly text, unbundled monthly text. In the 10 + 15%NET cash back, the cash back amount was the baseline 10% plus 15% of the net difference between healthy and unhealthy spending. The generic text included information on HF and healthy eating, while the personalized text had individualized feedback on purchases. The standard monthly text contained the cash back amount. The unbundled monthly text included the amount lost due to unhealthy purchases. The primary outcome was the average monthly percent healthy food spending. Secondary outcomes were the percent unhealthy food spending, and the percent healthy and unhealthy food items. Of the members contacted, 20 opted out, and 2841 met all inclusion criteria. There were no between-arm differences in the examined outcomes. The largest mean (standard deviation) difference in percent healthy spending was between Arm 1 (24.8% [11%]) and Arm 2 (26.8% [13%]), and the largest mean difference in percent unhealthy spending was also between Arm 1 (24.4% [20%]) and Arm 2 (21.7% [17%]), but no differences were statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. None of the tested financial incentive structures or text strategies differentially affected food purchasing. Notably, more than doubling the cash back amount and introducing a financial disincentive for unhealthy purchases did not affect purchasing. These findings speak to the difficulty of changing shopping habits and to the need for innovative strategies to shift complex health behaviors. NCT02486588 Increasing Engagement with a Healthy Food Benefit. The trial was prospectively registered on July 1, 2015.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The HealthyFood (HF) program offers members up to 25% cash back monthly on healthy food purchases. In this randomized controlled trial, we tested the efficacy of financial incentives combined with text messages in increasing healthy food purchases among HF members.
METHODS
METHODS
Members receiving the lowest (10%) cash back level were randomized to one of six arms: Arm 1 (Usual Care): 10% cash back, no weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 2: 10% cash back, generic weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 3: 10% cash back, personalized weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 4: 25% cash back, personalized weekly text, standard monthly text; Arm 5: 10 + 15%NET cash back, personalized weekly text, standard monthly text; and, Arm 6: 10 + 15%NET cash back, personalized weekly text, unbundled monthly text. In the 10 + 15%NET cash back, the cash back amount was the baseline 10% plus 15% of the net difference between healthy and unhealthy spending. The generic text included information on HF and healthy eating, while the personalized text had individualized feedback on purchases. The standard monthly text contained the cash back amount. The unbundled monthly text included the amount lost due to unhealthy purchases. The primary outcome was the average monthly percent healthy food spending. Secondary outcomes were the percent unhealthy food spending, and the percent healthy and unhealthy food items.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the members contacted, 20 opted out, and 2841 met all inclusion criteria. There were no between-arm differences in the examined outcomes. The largest mean (standard deviation) difference in percent healthy spending was between Arm 1 (24.8% [11%]) and Arm 2 (26.8% [13%]), and the largest mean difference in percent unhealthy spending was also between Arm 1 (24.4% [20%]) and Arm 2 (21.7% [17%]), but no differences were statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
None of the tested financial incentive structures or text strategies differentially affected food purchasing. Notably, more than doubling the cash back amount and introducing a financial disincentive for unhealthy purchases did not affect purchasing. These findings speak to the difficulty of changing shopping habits and to the need for innovative strategies to shift complex health behaviors.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
NCT02486588 Increasing Engagement with a Healthy Food Benefit. The trial was prospectively registered on July 1, 2015.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31151390
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6936-5
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-6936-5
pmc: PMC6544953
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02486588']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Pagination
674Subventions
Organisme : Discovery Vitality
ID : N/A
Références
Nutr Rev. 2006 Dec;64(12):518-31
pubmed: 17274494
Am J Public Health. 2008 Jan;98(1):98-105
pubmed: 18048803
JAMA. 2008 Dec 10;300(22):2631-7
pubmed: 19066383
Addiction. 2009 Feb;104(2):179-90
pubmed: 19149811
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 12;360(7):699-709
pubmed: 19213683
Tob Control. 2010 Feb;19(1):31-6
pubmed: 19850550
Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99
pubmed: 21225900
Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):172-80
pubmed: 22345242
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):382-9
pubmed: 22424251
Am J Health Behav. 2013 Jan;37(1):56-61
pubmed: 22943101
Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Apr;97(4):886-95
pubmed: 23446898
Prev Med. 2013 Oct;57(4):297-303
pubmed: 23639625
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jun;44(6):567-72
pubmed: 23683973
Appetite. 2013 Dec;71:411-9
pubmed: 24076020
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Dec;22(12):2459-61
pubmed: 25401929
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 19;17(1):e23
pubmed: 25599828
Yale J Biol Med. 2015 Sep 03;88(3):333-7
pubmed: 26339218
Alcohol Alcohol. 2016 Jul;51(4):493-502
pubmed: 26719379
Appetite. 2016 May 1;100:110-7
pubmed: 26879224
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Mar 1;36(3):564-571
pubmed: 28228484
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2017 Jun 22;9(1):e1-e9
pubmed: 28697616
J Nutr. 2018 Jan 1;148(1):109-116
pubmed: 29378043
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 3;15(7):e1002597
pubmed: 29969444
Am J Public Health. 1994 May;84(5):783-7
pubmed: 8179049