Method to measure the mismatch between target and achieved received dose intensity of chemotherapy in cancer trials: a retrospective analysis of the MRC BO06 trial in osteosarcoma.
chemotherapy
osteosarcoma
received dose intensity
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 05 2019
30 05 2019
Historique:
entrez:
2
6
2019
pubmed:
4
6
2019
medline:
28
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In cancer studies, the target received dose intensity (tRDI) for any regimen, the intended dose and time for the regimen, is commonly taken as a proxy for achieved RDI (aRDI), the actual individual dose and time for the regimen. Evaluating tRDI/aRDI mismatches is crucial to assess study results whenever patients are stratified on allocated regimen. The manuscript develops a novel methodology to highlight and evaluate tRDI/aRDI mismatches. Retrospective analysis of a randomised controlled trial, MRC BO06 (EORTC 80931). Population-based study but proposed methodology can be applied to other trial designs. A total of 497 patients with resectable high-grade osteosarcoma, of which 19 were excluded because chemotherapy was not started or the estimated dose was abnormally high (>1.25 × prescribed dose). Two regimens with the same anticipated cumulative dose (doxorubicin 6×75 mg/m For nearly half of the patients, there is a mismatch between tRDI and aRDI; for 21%, aRDI was closer to the tRDI of the other regimen. For MRC BO06, tRDI did not predict well aRDI. The manuscript offers an original procedure to highlight the presence of and quantify tRDI/aRDI mismatches. Caution is required to interpret the effect of chemotherapy-regimen intensification on survival outcome at an individual level where such a mismatch is present.The study relevance lies in the use of individual realisation of the intended treatment, which depends on individual delays and/or dose reductions reported throughout the treatment. ISRCTN86294690.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31152023
pii: bmjopen-2018-022980
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022980
pmc: PMC6549670
doi:
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN86294690']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e022980Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/21
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_12023/28
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Cancer Invest. 2004;22(4):555-68
pubmed: 15565814
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jul;95(29):e4282
pubmed: 27442667
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2009 Nov;72(2):170-9
pubmed: 19406660
J Clin Oncol. 1984 Nov;2(11):1281-8
pubmed: 6387060
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Dec;14(6):e575-e583
pubmed: 27102405
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Dec 15;18(24):4028-37
pubmed: 11118463
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Aug;50(8):1083-8
pubmed: 26030048
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009 Jun;28(1-2):247-63
pubmed: 19214708
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Jan;17(1):19-25
pubmed: 18181887
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011 Mar;77(3):221-40
pubmed: 20227889
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jan 17;99(2):112-28
pubmed: 17227995
Stat Med. 2005 Oct 30;24(20):3089-110
pubmed: 16189810
Eur J Cancer. 2003 Mar;39(4):488-94
pubmed: 12751380
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Sep;16(9):3137-47
pubmed: 9738586
J Clin Oncol. 1990 Dec;8(12):1935-7
pubmed: 2230885
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul;16(7):2452-8
pubmed: 9667263
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Sep 20;25(27):4157-8
pubmed: 17698802
Cancer. 2006 Mar 1;106(5):1154-61
pubmed: 16421923
Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 May;40(4):523-32
pubmed: 24345772
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jun;151(2):405-13
pubmed: 25956059