Five-year refracture rates of a province-wide fracture liaison service.
Age Distribution
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ankle Fractures
/ epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Fractures, Multiple
/ epidemiology
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Mass Screening
/ organization & administration
Middle Aged
Ontario
/ epidemiology
Osteoporotic Fractures
/ epidemiology
Recurrence
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Risk Factors
Secondary Prevention
/ organization & administration
Time Factors
Fracture liaison service
Fragility fracture
Refracture rates
Refracture risk
Journal
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
ISSN: 1433-2965
Titre abrégé: Osteoporos Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9100105
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
11
07
2018
accepted:
14
05
2019
pubmed:
4
6
2019
medline:
28
1
2020
entrez:
2
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We examined the 5-year refracture rate of 6543 patients and found an overall rate of 9.7%. Adjusted analysis showed that presenting with multiple fractures was an indicator of a higher refracture risk; while presenting with an ankle fracture was associated with a lower refracture risk. To examine refractures among patients screened in a province-wide fracture liaison service (FLS). We assessed the 5-year refracture rate of fragility fracture patients aged 50+ who were screened at 37 FLS fracture clinics in Ontario, Canada. Refracture was defined as a new hip, pelvis, spine, distal radius, or proximal humerus fracture. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for age, sex, and index fracture type were used to examine refracture rates. The 5-year refracture rate of 6543 patients was 9.7%. Those presenting with multiple fractures at baseline (i.e., two or more fractures occurring simultaneously) had the highest refracture rate of 19.6%. As compared to the 50-65 age group, refracture risk increased monotonically with age group (66-70 years: HR = 1.3, CI 95%, 1.0-1.7; 71-80 years: HR = 1.7, CI 1.4-2.1; 81+ years: HR = 3.0, CI 2.4-3.7). Relative to distal radius, presenting with multiple fractures at screening was associated with a higher risk of refracture (HR = 2.3 CI 1.6-3.1), while presenting with an ankle fracture was associated with a lower risk of refracture (HR = 0.7 CI 0.6-0.9). Sex was not a statistically significant predictor of refracture risk in this cohort (HR = 1.2, CI 1.0-1.5). One in ten patients in our cohort refractured within 5 years after baseline. Presenting with multiple fractures was an indicator of a higher refracture risk, while presenting with an ankle fracture was associated with a lower refracture risk. A more targeted FLS approach may be appropriate for patients at a higher refracture risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31152183
doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05017-3
pii: 10.1007/s00198-019-05017-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1671-1677Subventions
Organisme : Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
ID : N/A
Références
Osteoporos Int. 2006 Dec;17(12):1726-33
pubmed: 16983459
Int J Rheum Dis. 2014 Feb;17(2):195-203
pubmed: 24576275
Osteoporos Int. 2011 May;22(5):1335-42
pubmed: 20577872
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(48):e9012
pubmed: 29310418
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85(5):820-4
pubmed: 12728031
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Mar 16;152(6):380-90
pubmed: 20231569
CMAJ. 2010 Nov 23;182(17):1864-73
pubmed: 20940232
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jun;21(6):903-8
pubmed: 20309525
Endocr Rev. 2002 Aug;23(4):570-8
pubmed: 12202472
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Mar;28(3):863-869
pubmed: 27770155
Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):661-5
pubmed: 23140108
Osteoporos Int. 2004 Mar;15(3):175-9
pubmed: 14691617
J Bone Miner Res. 2000 Apr;15(4):721-39
pubmed: 10780864
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(3):348-54
pubmed: 16378167
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Apr 04;14:121
pubmed: 23557115
JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):387-94
pubmed: 17244835
JAMA. 2009 Feb 4;301(5):513-21
pubmed: 19190316
Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(11):903-8
pubmed: 11804016
Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(3):248-54
pubmed: 10824241
BMC Public Health. 2012 May 18;12:301
pubmed: 22537071
Age Ageing. 2016 Mar;45(2):236-42
pubmed: 26802076
Osteoporos Int. 2004 Oct;15(10):767-78
pubmed: 15258724
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Mar;27(3):873-879
pubmed: 26650377
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Nov;27(11):3165-3175
pubmed: 27230521
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar;22(3):849-58
pubmed: 21107534
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Jul;22(7):2051-65
pubmed: 21607807
Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:143
pubmed: 23740086
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Apr;35(5):293-305
pubmed: 16616152
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Sep 26;12:209
pubmed: 21943363
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Jul;27(7):2207-2215
pubmed: 26911297
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19;96(4):e29
pubmed: 24553898
J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Nov;28(11):2317-24
pubmed: 23616397
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Dec;21(12):2075-82
pubmed: 20162259