Liquid mycobacterial culture outcomes after different sputum collection techniques before and during treatment.
Adult
Antitubercular Agents
/ therapeutic use
Bacteriological Techniques
Chlorhexidine
/ administration & dosage
Coinfection
Drinking Water
Female
HIV Infections
/ diagnosis
Humans
Male
Microbial Viability
Mouthwashes
/ administration & dosage
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
/ drug effects
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Specimen Handling
/ methods
Sputum
/ microbiology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary
/ diagnosis
Chlorhexidine
HIV-Infection
Mouth wash
Sputum collection
Tuberculosis
Journal
Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland)
ISSN: 1873-281X
Titre abrégé: Tuberculosis (Edinb)
Pays: Scotland
ID NLM: 100971555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
01
11
2018
revised:
12
02
2019
accepted:
23
03
2019
entrez:
3
6
2019
pubmed:
4
6
2019
medline:
15
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mycobacterial sputum culture is a key diagnostic and research tool. To compare mycobacterial culture outcomes of three sputum collection methods. We compared culture results within sets of three sputum samples collected from 18 HIV-infected adult tuberculosis patients at regular intervals up to 84 days after treatment initiation. The first sputum was collected at home and brought to the clinic, where a second and third sputum were consecutively collected under supervision following mouthwash with bottled water and chlorhexidine solution respectively. All sputa were processed for liquid culture in duplicate. Out of 556 cultures 430 (77.3%), 91 (16.4%) and 35 (6.3%) were positive, negative or contaminated, respectively. The odds of contamination were higher with home collection and with water rinse than with chlorhexidine rinse (OR: 12.5, p < 0.001 and OR: 6.7, p = 0.015). Chlorhexidine rinse increased the odds of a negative culture compared to water rinse (OR: 3.5, p = 0.002). The odds of a positive culture were greater with water rinse than with home collection (OR: 2.5, p = 0.005). Water rinse significantly reduced time to culture positivity. Compared to sputum collected at home, chlorhexidine rinse reduces culture contamination and water rinse increases the rate and viable mycobacterial load of positive cultures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31153513
pii: S1472-9792(18)30466-9
doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2019.03.008
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antitubercular Agents
0
Drinking Water
0
Mouthwashes
0
Chlorhexidine
R4KO0DY52L
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17-21Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.