Diagnostic predictive value of the Bladder EpiCheck test in the follow-up of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.


Journal

Cancer cytopathology
ISSN: 1934-6638
Titre abrégé: Cancer Cytopathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101499453

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2019
Historique:
received: 24 03 2019
revised: 28 04 2019
accepted: 06 05 2019
pubmed: 4 6 2019
medline: 19 5 2020
entrez: 3 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Bladder EpiCheck test in the follow-up of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and to compare it with the accuracy of urinary cytology, cystoscopy, and/or histology. In total, 243 patients were enrolled in the current study. Patients were evaluated by voided urine cytology, by the Bladder EpiCheck test, and by white-light cystoscopy. Overall sensitivity was 33.3% for cytology, 62.3% for Bladder EpiCheck, and 66.7% for the 2 tests combined. The sensitivity of cytology increased from 7.7% in low-grade (LG) tumors to 66.6% in high-grade (HG) tumors; whereas, for the Bladder EpiCheck test, the sensitivity was 46.1% in LG tumors and 83.3% in HG tumors. Combined cytology and Bladder EpiCheck testing yielded an overall sensitivity of 56.4% for LG tumors and 90% for HG tumors. Overall specificity was 98.6% for cytology, 86.3% for Bladder EpiCheck, and 85.6% for the 2 tests combined. The positive predictive value was 92% for cytology and 68.2% for Bladder EpiCheck. For the 2 tests combined, it was 68.6%. The negative predictive value was similar for the 2 tests: 75.8% for cytology, 82.9% for Bladder EpiCheck, and 84.5% for the 2 tests combined. The sensitivity of the Bladder EpiCheck test was significantly higher than that of cytology. The test performed very well in terms of specificity but could not reach the high value of cytology. The positive predictive value was higher for Bladder EpiCheck, whereas the negative predictive value was approximately the same for both tests.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Bladder EpiCheck test in the follow-up of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and to compare it with the accuracy of urinary cytology, cystoscopy, and/or histology.
METHODS
In total, 243 patients were enrolled in the current study. Patients were evaluated by voided urine cytology, by the Bladder EpiCheck test, and by white-light cystoscopy.
RESULTS
Overall sensitivity was 33.3% for cytology, 62.3% for Bladder EpiCheck, and 66.7% for the 2 tests combined. The sensitivity of cytology increased from 7.7% in low-grade (LG) tumors to 66.6% in high-grade (HG) tumors; whereas, for the Bladder EpiCheck test, the sensitivity was 46.1% in LG tumors and 83.3% in HG tumors. Combined cytology and Bladder EpiCheck testing yielded an overall sensitivity of 56.4% for LG tumors and 90% for HG tumors. Overall specificity was 98.6% for cytology, 86.3% for Bladder EpiCheck, and 85.6% for the 2 tests combined. The positive predictive value was 92% for cytology and 68.2% for Bladder EpiCheck. For the 2 tests combined, it was 68.6%. The negative predictive value was similar for the 2 tests: 75.8% for cytology, 82.9% for Bladder EpiCheck, and 84.5% for the 2 tests combined.
CONCLUSIONS
The sensitivity of the Bladder EpiCheck test was significantly higher than that of cytology. The test performed very well in terms of specificity but could not reach the high value of cytology. The positive predictive value was higher for Bladder EpiCheck, whereas the negative predictive value was approximately the same for both tests.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31154670
doi: 10.1002/cncy.22152
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0

Types de publication

Comparative Study Evaluation Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

465-469

Informations de copyright

© 2019 American Cancer Society.

Auteurs

Emanuela Trenti (E)

Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.

Carolina D'Elia (C)

Department of Pathology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.

Christine Mian (C)

Department of Pathology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.

Christine Schwienbacher (C)

Department of Pathology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.

Esther Hanspeter (E)

Department of Pathology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.

Alexander Pycha (A)

Department of Urology, Lucerne Canton Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Mona Kafka (M)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Stephan Degener (S)

Department of Urology, Helios-Klinikum Wuppertal, Witten Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany.

Hansjörg Danuser (H)

Department of Urology, Lucerne Canton Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Stephan Roth (S)

Department of Urology, Helios-Klinikum Wuppertal, Witten Herdecke University, Wuppertal, Germany.

Armin Pycha (A)

Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Medical School, Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH