Factors Affecting Postoperative Sagittal Alignment after Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity: Posterior Osteotomy, Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Rupture, and Endplate Injury.

Adult spinal deformity Anterior longitudinal ligament rupture Endplate injury Lateral lumbar interbody fusion Minimally invasive surgical procedures Osteotomy Segmental sagittal alignment

Journal

Asian spine journal
ISSN: 1976-1902
Titre abrégé: Asian Spine J
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101314177

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2019
Historique:
received: 22 10 2018
accepted: 30 12 2018
entrez: 4 6 2019
pubmed: 4 6 2019
medline: 4 6 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Prospective cohort study. To identify factors that affect sagittal alignment correction in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) and to investigate the degree of correction in each condition. LIF is a useful procedure for ASD, but the degree of correction can be affected by posterior osteotomy, intraoperative endplate injury, or anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) rupture. Radiographical data for 30 patients who underwent LIF for ASD were examined prospectively. All underwent two-stage surgery (LIF followed by posterior fixation). Radiographical parameters were measured preoperatively, after LIF, and after posterior fixation; these included the segmental lordotic angle, lumbar lordosis (LL), and other sagittal alignment factors. LL was corrected from 16.5°±16.7° preoperatively to 33.4°±13.8° after LIF (p <0.001) and then to 52.1°±7.9° following posterior fixation (p <0.001). At levels where Schwab grade 2 osteotomy was performed, the acquired segmental lordotic angles from the preoperative value to after posterior fixation and from after LIF to after posterior fixation were 19.5°±9.2° and 9.9°±3.9°, respectively. On average, 12.4° more was added than in cases without osteotomy. Endplate injury was identified at 21 levels (19.4%) after LIF, with a mean loss of 3.4° in the acquired segmental lordotic angle (5.3°±8.4° and 1.9°±5.9° without and with endplate injury, respectively). ALL rupture was identified at seven levels (6.5%), and on average 19.3° more was added in these cases between the preoperative and postoperative values than in cases without ALL rupture. LIF provides adequate sagittal alignment restoration for ASD, but the degree of correction is affected by grade 2 osteotomy, intraoperative endplate injury, and ALL rupture.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31154704
pii: asj.2018.0275
doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0275
pmc: PMC6773999
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

738-745

Références

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2030-7; discussion 2038
pubmed: 16166890
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Mar 15;38(6):476-83
pubmed: 23492973
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jan;28(1):40-49
pubmed: 29087808
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 May;18(6):700-3
pubmed: 8516697
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Dec;20(8):586-93
pubmed: 18046172
Global Spine J. 2013 Mar;3(1):51-62
pubmed: 24436852
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23 Suppl 6:699-704
pubmed: 25217242
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 15;37(14):1268-73
pubmed: 22695245
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jul;19(1):110-8
pubmed: 23662890
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:381814
pubmed: 23213284
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S66-73
pubmed: 26839994
ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:246989
pubmed: 23213282
Eur Spine J. 2013 Mar;22 Suppl 2:S242-53
pubmed: 22836363
Neurosurgery. 2014 Jan;74(1):112-20; discussion 120
pubmed: 24356197
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Dec;25(6):697-705
pubmed: 27341052
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Dec;43(6):E6
pubmed: 29191100
Asian Spine J. 2016 Oct;10(5):907-914
pubmed: 27790319
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Feb;27(1):29-39
pubmed: 23429305
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25 Suppl 1:S29-33
pubmed: 25971442
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2017 Nov 27;1(4):197-202
pubmed: 31440634
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):623-35
pubmed: 24702513
Int J Spine Surg. 2017 Jun 30;11:23
pubmed: 28765807
World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:249-256
pubmed: 28559074
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2017 Nov 27;1(4):203-210
pubmed: 31440635
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 1;40(3):143-6
pubmed: 25394319
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Jul;15(1):92-6
pubmed: 21476802
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Nov;17(5):476-85
pubmed: 22938554
Spine J. 2006 Jul-Aug;6(4):435-43
pubmed: 16825052
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2024-9
pubmed: 16166889
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969 Sep-Oct;66:6-9
pubmed: 5357786

Auteurs

Hiroaki Nakashima (H)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan.

Tokumi Kanemura (T)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan.

Kotaro Satake (K)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan.

Yoshimoto Ishikawa (Y)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan.

Jun Ouchida (J)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Japan.

Naoki Segi (N)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Hidetoshi Yamaguchi (H)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Shiro Imagama (S)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Classifications MeSH