Noninvasive Stimulation of the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Indicates Valence Ambiguity in Sad Compared to Happy and Fearful Face Processing.

EEG MEG brain stimulation emotion faces tDCS

Journal

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5153
Titre abrégé: Front Behav Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477952

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 22 01 2019
accepted: 05 04 2019
entrez: 4 6 2019
pubmed: 4 6 2019
medline: 4 6 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is known to be specifically involved in the processing of stimuli with pleasant, rewarding meaning to the observer. By the use of non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), it was previously possible to show evidence for this valence specificity and to modulate the impact of the vmPFC on emotional network processing. Prior results showed increased neural activation during pleasant relative to unpleasant stimulus processing after excitatory compared to inhibitory vmPFC-tDCS. As dysfunctional vmPFC activation patterns are associated with major depressive disorder (MDD), tDCS of this region could render an attractive application in future therapy. Here, we investigated vmPFC-tDCS effects on sad compared to happy face processing, as sad faces are often used in the study of mood disorders. After counterbalanced inhibitory or excitatory tDCS, respectively, healthy participants viewed happy and sad faces during magnetoencephalography (MEG) recording. In addition, tDCS effects on an interpretational bias of ambiguous happy-sad face morphs and an attentional bias of a dot-probe task with happy and sad faces as emotional primes were investigated. Finally, in conjoint analyses with data from a previous sibling study (happy and fearful faces) we examined whether excitatory vmPFC-tDCS would reveal a general increase in processing of pleasant stimuli independent of the type of unpleasant stimuli applied (sad vs. fearful faces). MEG and behavioral results showed that happy faces promoted a relative positivity bias after excitatory compared to inhibitory tDCS, visible in left orbitofrontal cortex and in the emotion-primed dot-probe task. A converse pattern in the MEG data during sad face processing suggests the possible involvement of an empathy network and thus significantly differed from neuronal processing of fearful face processing. Implications for the bearing of vmPFC modulation on emotional face processing and the impact of specific unpleasant face expressions are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31156403
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00083
pmc: PMC6532016
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

83

Références

Biol Psychol. 2000 Mar;52(2):95-111
pubmed: 10699350
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):223-233
pubmed: 10827445
Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;158(3):405-15
pubmed: 11229981
Int J Psychophysiol. 2002 Sep;45(3):241-4
pubmed: 12208530
Neuroimage. 2003 Feb;18(2):263-72
pubmed: 12595181
Int J Psychophysiol. 2003 Jul;49(1):67-74
pubmed: 12853131
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003 Jun;3(2):97-110
pubmed: 12943325
Psychiatry Res. 1992 Jun;42(3):241-51
pubmed: 1496056
Neuropsychology. 2004 Apr;18(2):212-8
pubmed: 15099143
J Abnorm Psychol. 2004 Aug;113(3):386-98
pubmed: 15311984
J Physiol. 2005 Oct 1;568(Pt 1):291-303
pubmed: 16002441
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Dec;9(12):585-94
pubmed: 16289871
Neuroimage. 2006 Jun;31(2):906-19
pubmed: 16488159
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 7;45(1):124-43
pubmed: 16797609
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 7;45(1):174-94
pubmed: 16854439
Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:31-51
pubmed: 17015073
Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Sep 1;62(5):446-54
pubmed: 17217927
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Feb;116(1):80-5
pubmed: 17324018
Brain. 2007 Jul;130(Pt 7):1718-31
pubmed: 17392317
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Aug 15;164(1):177-90
pubmed: 17517438
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Sep;98(3):1374-9
pubmed: 17596422
Biol Psychol. 2008 Feb;77(2):159-73
pubmed: 18022310
Biol Psychol. 2008 Apr;78(1):93-103
pubmed: 18353522
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Aug 15;168(3):242-9
pubmed: 19564050
Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Dec 15;66(12):1075-82
pubmed: 19748076
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr;103(4):1735-40
pubmed: 20107115
Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Sep;31(9):1446-57
pubmed: 20127869
Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23
pubmed: 20633386
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2524-33
pubmed: 20951215
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Nov;11(11):773-83
pubmed: 20959860
Neuroscientist. 2011 Feb;17(1):18-24
pubmed: 21071616
Brain Stimul. 2011 Jan;4(1):38-42
pubmed: 21255753
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:861705
pubmed: 21577273
Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 15;57(4):1608-16
pubmed: 21624476
Neuron. 2011 Jun 23;70(6):1054-69
pubmed: 21689594
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Aug;7(6):611-22
pubmed: 21719425
Mol Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;17(2):132-41
pubmed: 21788943
Curr Biol. 2012 Feb 21;22(4):332-7
pubmed: 22305750
Biol Psychol. 2013 Mar;92(3):513-9
pubmed: 22560889
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Jul;23(7):1552-61
pubmed: 22661409
Clin Psychol Rev. 2012 Jul;32(5):413-24
pubmed: 22681914
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:1-23
pubmed: 22715878
Depress Anxiety. 2013 Mar;30(3):242-50
pubmed: 23139148
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Apr;88(1):17-25
pubmed: 23280304
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Jun;9(6):873-9
pubmed: 23576808
Transl Psychiatry. 2013 Jun 11;3:e268
pubmed: 23756377
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Sep;51(11):2051-61
pubmed: 23880097
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 05;8(8):e70788
pubmed: 23940642
Neuroreport. 2014 May 7;25(7):480-4
pubmed: 24384505
Brain Connect. 2015 Feb;5(1):1-9
pubmed: 24575774
Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 22;24(18):R875-R878
pubmed: 25247366
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 14;9(11):e109949
pubmed: 25396729
Brain Stimul. 2016 Jul-Aug;9(4):529-36
pubmed: 27037186
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Feb 20;14:530-537
pubmed: 28331799
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Jun 1;27(6):3449-3456
pubmed: 28369363
Neuroimage. 2018 Jul 15;175:388-401
pubmed: 29605579
Neuromodulation. 2018 May 9;:
pubmed: 29741803
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Apr 25;12:76
pubmed: 29922133
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1988 Nov;40(4):653-70
pubmed: 3212208
J Abnorm Psychol. 1986 Feb;95(1):15-20
pubmed: 3700842
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1994 Jan;32(1):35-42
pubmed: 8182960
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952

Auteurs

Constantin Winker (C)

Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Maimu A Rehbein (MA)

Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Dean Sabatinelli (D)

Department of Psychology and BioImaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States.

Mira Dohn (M)

Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Julius Maitzen (J)

Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Kati Roesmann (K)

Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Carsten H Wolters (CH)

Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Volker Arolt (V)

Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Markus Junghoefer (M)

Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Classifications MeSH