Lateral Locked Plating or Dual Plating: A Comparison of Two Methods in Simple Bicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures.
Bicondylar tibial plateau
Dual plate
Fracture
Locking plate fixation
Single plate
Journal
Clinics in orthopedic surgery
ISSN: 2005-4408
Titre abrégé: Clin Orthop Surg
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101505087
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
24
10
2018
revised:
24
01
2019
accepted:
08
02
2019
entrez:
4
6
2019
pubmed:
4
6
2019
medline:
24
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this study, our aim was to compare the results of the dual locking plate fixation technique and lateral locking plate fixation technique for tibial bicondylar plateau fractures without posteromedial fragment. We evaluated 20 patients who underwent surgical treatment due to bicondylar tibial plateau fracture between 2010 and 2015. Ten patients were included in group 1, in which a dual locking plate was employed, whereas 10 patients were included in group 2, in which a lateral locking plate was used. In both groups, functional and clinical outcomes after treatment were rated according to the Knee Society Knee Scoring System, Rasmussen functional score, and Rasmussen radiological score. The mean follow-up time was 24 months. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to functional and radiographic outcomes at the final follow-up. In bicondylar tibial plateau fractures without posteromedial fragment, the lateral locking plate fixation technique showed the similar clinical and radiological outcomes as the dual locking plate fixation technique.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In this study, our aim was to compare the results of the dual locking plate fixation technique and lateral locking plate fixation technique for tibial bicondylar plateau fractures without posteromedial fragment.
METHODS
METHODS
We evaluated 20 patients who underwent surgical treatment due to bicondylar tibial plateau fracture between 2010 and 2015. Ten patients were included in group 1, in which a dual locking plate was employed, whereas 10 patients were included in group 2, in which a lateral locking plate was used. In both groups, functional and clinical outcomes after treatment were rated according to the Knee Society Knee Scoring System, Rasmussen functional score, and Rasmussen radiological score.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean follow-up time was 24 months. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to functional and radiographic outcomes at the final follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In bicondylar tibial plateau fractures without posteromedial fragment, the lateral locking plate fixation technique showed the similar clinical and radiological outcomes as the dual locking plate fixation technique.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31156765
doi: 10.4055/cios.2019.11.2.151
pmc: PMC6526137
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
151-158Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Références
J Orthop Trauma. 1999 Nov;13(8):545-9
pubmed: 10714780
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Jan;84(1):15-8
pubmed: 11837825
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Jul;(412):189-95
pubmed: 12838071
J Trauma. 2004 Aug;57(2):340-6
pubmed: 15345983
J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Sep;18(8):546-51
pubmed: 15475851
J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Aug;19(7):448-55; discussion 456
pubmed: 16056075
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Dec;88(12):2613-23
pubmed: 17142411
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Feb;21(2):83-91
pubmed: 17304060
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 May;21(5):301-6
pubmed: 17485994
Knee. 2008 Mar;15(2):139-43
pubmed: 18215801
J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Mar;22(3):176-82
pubmed: 18317051
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Apr;91(4):426-33
pubmed: 19336799
Int Orthop. 2010 Apr;34(4):565-70
pubmed: 19440710
J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69(1):148-55
pubmed: 20622588
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Nov;24(11):683-92
pubmed: 20881634
Int Orthop. 2011 Aug;35(8):1215-21
pubmed: 21107983
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2011 Apr;6(1):21-6
pubmed: 21589678
Musculoskelet Surg. 2012 Aug;96(2):75-80
pubmed: 22120784
Injury. 2012 Jun;43(6):864-9
pubmed: 22169068
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013 Oct;29(10):568-77
pubmed: 24099112
J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Jul 20;9:62
pubmed: 25038620
Knee. 2015 Jun;22(3):225-9
pubmed: 25747747
Indian J Orthop. 2015 Mar-Apr;49(2):193-8
pubmed: 26015609
Int Orthop. 2016 Oct;40(10):2129-2141
pubmed: 27008456
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):13-4
pubmed: 2805470
Acta Ortop Bras. 2017 May-Jun;25(3):99-102
pubmed: 28642671
J Orthop Trauma. 1987;1(2):97-119
pubmed: 3333518
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973 Oct;55(7):1331-50
pubmed: 4586086