Proposed model to determine satisfaction with computerised provider order entry systems in a long-stay hospital.
computer assisted prescribing (CPOE)
electronic prescribing
medical errors
quality in health care
Journal
European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice
ISSN: 2047-9964
Titre abrégé: Eur J Hosp Pharm
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101578294
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
07
07
2017
revised:
15
09
2017
accepted:
26
09
2017
entrez:
4
6
2019
pubmed:
4
6
2019
medline:
4
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Computerised provider order entry (CPOE) systems reduce medication errors, but are not without dangers. Knowing satisfaction with the CPOE helps to improve its implementation. Our objective was to determine the satisfaction of healthcare professionals with the CPOE in a long-stay hospital and to propose a single model. A cross-sectional study in a long-stay hospital. Two questionnaires were distributed to determine satisfaction with CPOE, one for medical personnel (MP) and another for nursing personnel (NP). Data collected were: sex, age and work aspects. A strategy for item refinement and creation of a single scale was designed. The overall participation rate was 63.6%, with 68 responses from the target population of 107. Overall, 72.2% (13 of 18) of MP and 40% (20 of 50) of NP were satisfied with CPOE. Regarding the specific questions on satisfaction in the questionnaires, 88.9% (n=16) of MP were very satisfied but only 56.0% (n=28) of NP. The median of each question was 4, with the exception of those for NP referring to a faster process and improved coordination, which were 3 and 3.5, respectively. The items weighing more in the second component were eliminated and the questions merged. After refining the items, a final six-item model was obtained with a single component of high reliability (Cronbach's α=0.896), which accounts for 67% of total variance. The degree of satisfaction with CPOE in a long-stay hospital was high, though lower in NP than MP. Obtaining a single questionnaire can facilitate this process.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31157103
doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001345
pii: ejhpharm-2017-001345
pmc: PMC6452410
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
73-78Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Dec;21(6):408-14
pubmed: 19841027
Med Clin (Barc). 2011 Apr 9;136(9):398-402
pubmed: 20434736
Appl Clin Inform. 2010 Jan 1;1(3):268-285
pubmed: 21423791
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Dec;18 Suppl 1:i51-61
pubmed: 21486876
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):252-9
pubmed: 23100129
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Aug;35(4):577-83
pubmed: 23575623
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Aug 09;13:86
pubmed: 24070335
HSS J. 2014 Feb;10(1):52-8
pubmed: 24482622
BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 06;4(11):e005569
pubmed: 25377010
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0138094
pubmed: 26367388
World J Pediatr. 2016 Feb;12(1):28-34
pubmed: 26684316
BMJ. 2016 May 03;353:i2139
pubmed: 27143499
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Aug 8;24:e2742
pubmed: 27508913
Farm Hosp. 2016 Sep 01;40(5):333-40
pubmed: 27570985
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016 Oct 04;7:157-171
pubmed: 27785116
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Jun 6;5(1):
pubmed: 27822373
Farm Hosp. 2017 Jan 01;41(n01):14-30
pubmed: 28045650
Mhealth. 2016 Jul 22;2:29
pubmed: 28293602
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Apr 05;8(2):337-347
pubmed: 28378024
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Dec 1;138(11):923-36
pubmed: 8256780