Spatial and temporal variability in costs and effectiveness in phosphorus loss mitigation at farm scale: A scenario analysis.

Cost-effectiveness Nutrient management Phosphorus Water quality

Journal

Journal of environmental management
ISSN: 1095-8630
Titre abrégé: J Environ Manage
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401664

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Sep 2019
Historique:
received: 22 10 2018
revised: 15 05 2019
accepted: 21 05 2019
pubmed: 4 6 2019
medline: 26 9 2019
entrez: 4 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Current policy instruments under the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) to mitigate phosphorus (P) loss require that P use on farms is managed through regulation of farm gate P balances. Regulation at farm scale does not account for spatial variability in nutrient use and soil fertility at field scale, affecting the costs and effectiveness of farm gate measures. This study simulated the implementation of a P loss mitigation measure coupled with improving soil fertility so that farm productivity would not be compromised. The measure was simulated at field scale and the costs and effectiveness assessed at farm scale. Effectiveness was expressed as the time taken for excessive soil P levels to decline to levels that matched off-takes and this varied temporally and spatially within and between farms ranging from 1 to 8 years. Sub-optimum soil fertility was corrected on all fields across both farms, with applications of other soil nutrients and lime to protect productivity. An increase in costs ranging from 1.5 to 116% was predicted in the first two years of the measure on both farms after-which savings of 15-31% were predicted for each subsequent year until the measure was effective in year 9. Despite initial cost increase, there was no statistically significant difference in costs over the time taken for the measure to be effective, when compared to baseline costs. Successful implementation of measures should consider the impact on farm costs and time taken for measures to environmentally effective. Adoption of measures could improve if demonstrating to farmers that costs will not vary significantly from current practice and in time may results in savings if measures are paired with correcting soil fertility and increasing yields. This 'win-win' approach could be used into the future to ensure successful implementation and uptake of measures within the farming community.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31158685
pii: S0301-4797(19)30700-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.080
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Soil 0
Water 059QF0KO0R
Phosphorus 27YLU75U4W

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

330-337

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Lyubov Bragina (L)

Teagasc Rural Economy and Development Programme, Mellow Campus, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland.

Evgenia Micha (E)

Countryside and Community Research Institute, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, United Kingdom.

William M Roberts (WM)

University of Chichester Business School, West Sussex, United Kingdom.

Kay O'Connell (K)

Teagasc Environment Soils and Land Use, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Co. Wexford, Ireland.

Cathal O'Donoghue (C)

National University of Ireland, Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland.

Mary Ryan (M)

Teagasc Rural Economy and Development Programme, Mellow Campus, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland.

Karen Daly (K)

Teagasc Environment Soils and Land Use, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Co. Wexford, Ireland. Electronic address: Karen.Daly@teagasc.ie.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Animals Dietary Fiber Dextran Sulfate Mice Disease Models, Animal
Silicon Dioxide Water Hot Temperature Compressive Strength X-Ray Diffraction
Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal

Classifications MeSH