Daily metabolic expenditures: estimates from US, UK and polish time-use data.


Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jun 2019
Historique:
entrez: 5 6 2019
pubmed: 5 6 2019
medline: 14 8 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Behaviour has diverse economic, social and health consequences. Linking time spent in different daily activities to energy expenditure (EE) is one way of investigating the health and physiological consequences of behaviour and identifying targets to improve population health and well-being. We estimated behaviour-related EE for respondents to time use surveys (TUS) from three countries: UK 2001, Poland 2012 and US 2003-13. The Harmonised Multinational Time Use Survey (MTUS) activity categories were matched to MET estimates from the 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities. We attach METs values to each successive activity in the TUS, together with both the original UK, Polish and US activity classifications and the 68-category MTUS activity classification. We used TUS estimates of activity durations across 24-h to estimate the Physical Activity Level (PAL) for respondents from the three countries and the average time spent and MET values for different activity categories. PAL values ranged from 1.59 in the US to 1.74 in Poland. The main sources of daily EE from PA were paid and unpaid work activities. Discretionary PA accounted for only a very small part (~ 3%) of adult daily energy expenditures. Using the harmonised MTUS 68-activity classification reduced the variability of the aggregate PAEE measure by ~ 20%, but the patterns of association between key demographics (age, sex, educational attainment) were unaffected. TUS data were further used to (1) identify sources of daily PA, and (2) assess adherence to physical activity guidelines (PAG) on a single-day basis. Estimated adherence levels were similar to those reported from other TUS as well as frequency based estimates. Comparative studies of energy expenditure based on harmonised time use activity categories could provide insight into the relative importance of different activities for energy expenditure across different countries and demographic groups. However, new observational studies combining TUS data with accelerometer, direct observation and other measures of activity intensity are required for more accurate MET assignments to activity categories in TUS.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Behaviour has diverse economic, social and health consequences. Linking time spent in different daily activities to energy expenditure (EE) is one way of investigating the health and physiological consequences of behaviour and identifying targets to improve population health and well-being.
METHODS METHODS
We estimated behaviour-related EE for respondents to time use surveys (TUS) from three countries: UK 2001, Poland 2012 and US 2003-13. The Harmonised Multinational Time Use Survey (MTUS) activity categories were matched to MET estimates from the 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities. We attach METs values to each successive activity in the TUS, together with both the original UK, Polish and US activity classifications and the 68-category MTUS activity classification. We used TUS estimates of activity durations across 24-h to estimate the Physical Activity Level (PAL) for respondents from the three countries and the average time spent and MET values for different activity categories.
RESULTS RESULTS
PAL values ranged from 1.59 in the US to 1.74 in Poland. The main sources of daily EE from PA were paid and unpaid work activities. Discretionary PA accounted for only a very small part (~ 3%) of adult daily energy expenditures. Using the harmonised MTUS 68-activity classification reduced the variability of the aggregate PAEE measure by ~ 20%, but the patterns of association between key demographics (age, sex, educational attainment) were unaffected. TUS data were further used to (1) identify sources of daily PA, and (2) assess adherence to physical activity guidelines (PAG) on a single-day basis. Estimated adherence levels were similar to those reported from other TUS as well as frequency based estimates.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Comparative studies of energy expenditure based on harmonised time use activity categories could provide insight into the relative importance of different activities for energy expenditure across different countries and demographic groups. However, new observational studies combining TUS data with accelerometer, direct observation and other measures of activity intensity are required for more accurate MET assignments to activity categories in TUS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31159771
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6762-9
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-6762-9
pmc: PMC6546617
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

453

Références

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S498-504
pubmed: 10993420
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 3;19(Suppl 2):478
pubmed: 31159761
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004 Feb 12;1(1):4
pubmed: 15169563
J Phys Act Health. 2009;6 Suppl 1:S5-8
pubmed: 19998844
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Nov;49(11):2351-2360
pubmed: 28604558
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2005 May 17;2:5
pubmed: 15904531
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Nov 15;172(10):1199-206
pubmed: 20855469
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Mar;44(3):290-6
pubmed: 23415127
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 3;17(1):620
pubmed: 28673271
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 09;8(10):e76632
pubmed: 24130784
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1575-81
pubmed: 21681120
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jun 12;9:71
pubmed: 22691823
J Phys Act Health. 2011 May;8(4):581-6
pubmed: 21597131
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56620
pubmed: 23437187
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Nov;104(5):1424-1432
pubmed: 27707702
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181-8
pubmed: 18091006
Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):219-29
pubmed: 22818936
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Oct;39(4):e13-20
pubmed: 20837277
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;57(4):387-95
pubmed: 25446555
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Jan;25(1):71-80
pubmed: 8292105
Int J Health Geogr. 2013 Apr 10;12:20
pubmed: 23575288
Obes Rev. 2012 Aug;13(8):659-80
pubmed: 22694051
Am J Health Behav. 2016 Jan;40(1):123-31
pubmed: 26685821
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Apr 1;167(7):875-81
pubmed: 18303006
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Jun 30;12:89
pubmed: 26122724
Physiol Meas. 2016 Sep;37(9):1447-55
pubmed: 27510765
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Dec;88(12):1398-407
pubmed: 24290113
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19657
pubmed: 21647427
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Feb;50(2):266-276
pubmed: 28930863
J Phys Act Health. 2012 Jan;9 Suppl 1:S11-8
pubmed: 22287443
J Phys Act Health. 2009 May;6(3):347-53
pubmed: 19564664
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Sep;41(9):1698-705
pubmed: 19657302
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Oct 21;8:115
pubmed: 22018588
J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Mar;18(2):161-6
pubmed: 24702944
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Feb 8;15(1):15
pubmed: 29422051
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Mar 31;6:21
pubmed: 19335883
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Jan;44(1):118-25
pubmed: 21659903
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Aug;45(8):1629-38
pubmed: 23863547
J Sports Sci. 2017 Feb;35(3):255-261
pubmed: 27019092
J Phys Act Health. 2009 Jan;6(1):6-14
pubmed: 19211953
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Jul;90(7):911-26
pubmed: 26071068
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Apr;47(4):833-8
pubmed: 25102292
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013 Oct;67(10):1095-9
pubmed: 24002044
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 03;10(12):e0142198
pubmed: 26633807
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Sep 27;4:45
pubmed: 17897472
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 1;12(2):e0169649
pubmed: 28146576
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Feb 13;10:22
pubmed: 23406270
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253
pubmed: 11234459
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Oct;46(10):2014-24
pubmed: 24561818
J Phys Act Health. 2012 Jan;9 Suppl 1:S19-28
pubmed: 22287444
Prev Med. 2010 Apr;50(4):199-203
pubmed: 20093137
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Feb;50(2):246-256
pubmed: 28938248
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 3;19(Suppl 2):455
pubmed: 31159770
Biometrics. 2009 Dec;65(4):1003-10
pubmed: 19302405
Prev Med. 2007 Dec;45(6):416-23
pubmed: 17316777
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Dec;88(12):1368-77
pubmed: 24290110
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Mar;48(3):457-65
pubmed: 26484953

Auteurs

Teresa Harms (T)

Department of Social Science, Centre for Time Use Research, University College London, 55-59 Gordon Square, London, WCH 0NU, UK. t.harms@ucl.ac.uk.

David Berrigan (D)

National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Jonathan Gershuny (J)

Department of Social Science, Centre for Time Use Research, University College London, 55-59 Gordon Square, London, WCH 0NU, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH