Scrotal enlargement in rams and bucks in Qassim region, central of Saudi Arabia: clinical and ultrasonographic findings and seroprevalence of brucellosis.
Brucella spp.
Bucks
Orchitis
Rams
Scrotal enlargement
Journal
Tropical animal health and production
ISSN: 1573-7438
Titre abrégé: Trop Anim Health Prod
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1277355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
29
01
2019
accepted:
15
05
2019
pubmed:
5
6
2019
medline:
4
12
2019
entrez:
5
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to clarify the causes of scrotal enlargement in rams and bucks in Qassim region of Saudi Arabia. Enlarged scrotal contents of rams and bucks (n = 153) were examined by visual inspection, palpation, and ultrasonography. Blood samples were obtained and tested for Brucella sp. infection. Clinical and ultrasonographic findings showed that scrotal enlargement was mainly associated with orchitis, peri-orchitis, and epididymitis. Miscellaneous findings were scrotal hernia, scrotal hematoma, and hydrocele. The frequencies of orchitis, peri-orchitis, and epididymitis were 47.4, 21.1, and 14.1% in Awassi rams; 54.5, 21.7, and 8.7% in Najdi rams; 52.3, 20.5, and 9.1% in Ardi bucks; and 50, 16.7, and 16.7% in Damascus bucks, respectively. Orchitis was associated with no-abscess formation (23%), single-abscess formation (15.4%), and multiple-abscesses formation (61.6%). Peri-orchitis was characterized by hard consistency, atrophy of the testes, and extensive connective tissue formation. Epididymitis was observed mainly at the tail of the epididymis (82.4%) but rarely at the head (17.6%). Epididymitis was associated in many cases with abscessation (70.6%). Males with orchitis, peri-orchitis, and epididymitis were positive for Brucella melitensis and Brucella ovis in the frequency of 21.3% and 48.8%, respectively. In conclusion, scrotal enlargement in rams and bucks in Qassim region is caused mainly by inflammation of the testis and/or epididymis and associated tremendously with brucellosis seropositivity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31161484
doi: 10.1007/s11250-019-01937-8
pii: 10.1007/s11250-019-01937-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2109-2114Références
J Chemother. 2001 Apr;13 Suppl 1:11-7
pubmed: 11434523
Vet Microbiol. 2002 Dec 20;90(1-4):81-110
pubmed: 12414137
Vet Rec. 2003 Dec 13;153(24):752-3
pubmed: 14703181
Theriogenology. 2004 Oct 1;62(7):1307-28
pubmed: 15325557
Theriogenology. 2007 Jan 15;67(2):303-10
pubmed: 16935325
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007 Mar;19(2):194-7
pubmed: 17402617
J Vet Sci. 2007 Jun;8(2):185-91
pubmed: 17519574
N Z Vet J. 2007 Jun;55(3):125-9
pubmed: 17534414
Radiographics. 2008 Oct;28(6):1617-29
pubmed: 18936025
Can J Vet Res. 2009 Apr;73(2):157-60
pubmed: 19436586
Vet Res Commun. 1991;15(4):301-8
pubmed: 1949603
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2011 Mar;27(1):61-66
pubmed: 21215890
Reprod Domest Anim. 2012 Oct;47(5):740-5
pubmed: 22136299
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Jun 1;105(1-2):118-26
pubmed: 22385780
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1990 Nov;6(3):683-90
pubmed: 2245369
Braz J Microbiol. 2014 Apr 08;45(1):205-8
pubmed: 24948932
Vet Q. 2015 Jun;35(2):82-7
pubmed: 25793626
BMC Vet Res. 2015 May 30;11:125
pubmed: 26025374
Vet Microbiol. 2015 Dec 14;181(1-2):130-5
pubmed: 26209019
Res Vet Sci. 1979 Mar;26(2):145-51
pubmed: 262595
BMC Vet Res. 2015 Nov 26;11:289
pubmed: 26612501
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Jan 1;123:97-101
pubmed: 26688562
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Mar 26;9:190
pubmed: 27017445
New Microbes New Infect. 2018 Aug 16;26:1-2
pubmed: 30245825
Aust Vet J. 1987 Apr;64(4):123
pubmed: 3304257
Acta Vet Hung. 1987;35(4):427-31
pubmed: 3447464
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1985 Sep 1;187(5):500
pubmed: 4055476
Aust Vet J. 1969 Feb;45(2):63-7
pubmed: 4388442
Trop Anim Health Prod. 1983 Aug;15(3):139-43
pubmed: 6623644
Acta Vet Hung. 1994;42(1):25-33
pubmed: 7810398
Vet Microbiol. 1998 Nov;64(1):61-73
pubmed: 9874104