Compensatory and Catalyzing Beliefs: Their Relationship to Pro-environmental Behavior and Behavioral Spillover in Seven Countries.

behavioral spillover compensatory beliefs pro-environmental behavior pro-environmental identity survey methods

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 01 10 2018
accepted: 11 04 2019
entrez: 6 6 2019
pubmed: 6 6 2019
medline: 6 6 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There is growing research interest in behavioral spillover and its potential for enabling more widespread lifestyle change than has typically been achieved through discrete behavioral interventions. There are some routes by which spillover could take place without conscious attention or explicit recognition of the connections between separate behaviors. However, in many cases there is an expectation that an individual will perceive behaviors to be conceptually related, specifically in terms of their compensatory (suppressing further action) or catalyzing (promoting further action) properties, as a prerequisite for both negative and positive spillover. Despite this, relatively little research has been carried out to assess the beliefs that may underpin spillover processes as held by individuals themselves, or to measure these directly. We develop and evaluate a survey-based instrument for this purpose, doing so in a sample of seven countries worldwide: Brazil, China, Denmark, India, Poland, South Africa, and the United Kingdom (approx. 1,000 respondents per country). This approach allows us to assess these measures and to compare findings between countries. As part of this, we consider the connections between beliefs about behavioral relationships, and other key variables such as pro-environmental identity and personal preferences. We observe higher levels of endorsement of compensatory beliefs than previous research, and even higher levels of endorsement of novel items assessing catalyzing beliefs. For the first time, we present evidence of the validity of such measures with respect to comparable constructs, and in relation to people's consistency across different types of behaviors. We reflect on the implications of considering the relationships between behaviors in the context of people's subjective beliefs and offer recommendations for developing this line of research in the broader context of spillover research and within a cross-cultural framework.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31164844
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00963
pmc: PMC6536624
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

963

Références

Psychol Health. 2012;27(9):1062-74
pubmed: 22369574
Environ Behav. 2018 May;50(4):401-425
pubmed: 29657331
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:363-85
pubmed: 26393870
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Apr;41(4):540-58
pubmed: 25716992
Br J Health Psychol. 2011 Sep;16(3):610-25
pubmed: 21199538
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Jul;17(7):1451-2
pubmed: 19247284
Psychol Bull. 2013 Sep;139(5):1113-47
pubmed: 23339521

Auteurs

Stuart Capstick (S)

School of Psychology and Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Lorraine Whitmarsh (L)

School of Psychology and Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Nick Nash (N)

School of Psychology and Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Paul Haggar (P)

School of Psychology and Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Josh Lord (J)

School of Psychology and Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH