Key mechanisms by which post-ICU activities can improve in-ICU care: results of the international THRIVE collaboratives.
Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Critical Care
/ organization & administration
Family
/ psychology
Feedback
Female
Humans
Intensive Care Units
/ organization & administration
Interviews as Topic
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Qualitative Research
Quality Improvement
/ organization & administration
Subacute Care
/ organization & administration
Survivors
/ psychology
Intensive care unit follow-up clinics
Peer support
Post-intensive care syndrome
Journal
Intensive care medicine
ISSN: 1432-1238
Titre abrégé: Intensive Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7704851
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2019
07 2019
Historique:
received:
17
01
2019
accepted:
24
04
2019
pubmed:
6
6
2019
medline:
9
4
2020
entrez:
6
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To identify the key mechanisms that clinicians perceive improve care in the intensive care unit (ICU), as a result of their involvement in post-ICU programs. Qualitative inquiry via focus groups and interviews with members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine's THRIVE collaborative sites (follow-up clinics and peer support). Framework analysis was used to synthesize and interpret the data. Five key mechanisms were identified as drivers of improvement back into the ICU: (1) identifying otherwise unseen targets for ICU quality improvement or education programs-new ideas for quality improvement were generated and greater attention paid to detail in clinical care. (2) Creating a new role for survivors in the ICU-former patients and family members adopted an advocacy or peer volunteer role. (3) Inviting critical care providers to the post-ICU program to educate, sensitize, and motivate them-clinician peers and trainees were invited to attend as a helpful learning strategy to gain insights into post-ICU care requirements. (4) Changing clinician's own understanding of patient experience-there appeared to be a direct individual benefit from working in post-ICU programs. (5) Improving morale and meaningfulness of ICU work-this was achieved by closing the feedback loop to ICU clinicians regarding patient and family outcomes. The follow-up of patients and families in post-ICU care settings is perceived to improve care within the ICU via five key mechanisms. Further research is required in this novel area.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31165227
doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05647-5
pii: 10.1007/s00134-019-05647-5
pmc: PMC6611738
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
939-947Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K01 HL140279
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K12 HL137943
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
BMJ. 2015 Feb 10;350:g7714
pubmed: 25670179
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244
pubmed: 28528569
Clin Nurse Spec. 2016 Jul-Aug;30(4):227-37
pubmed: 27309787
Aust Crit Care. 2008 Feb;21(1):6-17
pubmed: 18206381
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):1522-1531
pubmed: 29957717
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Int J Older People Nurs. 2012 Jun;7(2):83-94
pubmed: 22531048
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45
pubmed: 12826639
J Crit Care. 2018 Aug;46:141-148
pubmed: 29929705
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800
pubmed: 26903337
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 02;11:CD012701
pubmed: 30388297
Intensive Care Med. 2003 Mar;29(3):368-77
pubmed: 12536269
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1317-1330
pubmed: 30193239
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 31;10(8):e0136955
pubmed: 26322644
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 29;12(11):e0188028
pubmed: 29186177
Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):e21-e27
pubmed: 30422863
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Oct;27(5):418-20
pubmed: 26294709
Hum Reprod. 2016 Mar;31(3):498-501
pubmed: 26759142
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):901-10
pubmed: 25867659