A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of a Novel Pain Management Device, AT-02, in Patients with Fibromyalgia.
Chronic Pain
Clinical Trial
Fibromyalgia
Magnetic Field Therapy
Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal
Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)
ISSN: 1526-4637
Titre abrégé: Pain Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100894201
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2020
01 02 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
6
6
2019
medline:
23
1
2021
entrez:
6
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Existing treatments for fibromyalgia have limited efficacy, and only a minority of individuals clinically respond to any single intervention. This study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of alternating magnetic field therapy in fibromyalgia patients by comparing the Angel Touch device (AT-02) with a sham control (S-01). Two sites enrolled 44 subjects with diagnosed fibromyalgia. After informed consent, subjects taking prohibited concomitant drugs underwent a washout period of two or more weeks. All subjects then began a one-week run-in period. Numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores were collected without device intervention for one day, followed by S-01 application to four or more painful sites for 10 minutes at each site, twice daily for six days. Subjects were then randomized to AT-02 or S-01, applied to four or more painful sites for 10 minutes at each site, twice daily for eight weeks. NRS scores were obtained twice daily during the entire treatment period. The primary end point (change in NRS ± SD at week 8 vs baseline) was -0.94 ± 1.33 in the AT-02 group and -0.22 ± 1.38 in the S-01 group. A trend toward a between-group difference in eight-week NRS scores favored the AT-02 group (-0.73, 95% confidence interval = -1.56 to 0.11, P = 0.086). An adjusted repeated measure analysis detected a significant difference in NRS scores (P = 0.039). The reduction in NRS scores for AT-02 relative to sham was comparable to reductions observed in meta-analyses of fibromyalgia drug therapy. The unadjusted results and the persistence of the pain score reductions remain encouraging.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31165895
pii: 5511537
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz064
pmc: PMC7007501
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
326-332Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine.
Références
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2012 Mar;32(2):245-53
pubmed: 21968643
Pain. 2013 Nov;154(11):2554-62
pubmed: 23900134
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 09;10:CD012172
pubmed: 28990665
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jan 17;16(1):201
pubmed: 24433463
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;75(12):1394-401
pubmed: 25271871
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Dec;41(3):335-45.e6
pubmed: 21868065
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;(6):CD006142
pubmed: 26075732
J Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;35(3):502-14
pubmed: 18278830
Pain. 2016 Sep;157(9):2089-96
pubmed: 27218868
Int J Neurosci. 1992 May-Jun;64(1-4):15-22
pubmed: 1342034
Arthritis Res Ther. 2012 Oct 12;14(5):R217
pubmed: 23062189
J Rheumatol. 2011 Dec;38(12):2643-52
pubmed: 21965636
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 29;9:CD011790
pubmed: 27684492
Phys Ther. 2015 Jan;95(1):129-40
pubmed: 25212518
Depress Anxiety. 2012 Jul;29(7):587-96
pubmed: 22689344
Headache. 2017 Mar;57(3):517-524
pubmed: 28028801
Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Feb;33(2):160-72
pubmed: 2306288