Partial and total replacement of meat by plant-based proteins in chicken sausage: evaluation of mechanical, physico-chemical and sensory characteristics.

Emulsified meat Meat alternative Plant proteins Sausage Textural properties

Journal

Journal of food science and technology
ISSN: 0022-1155
Titre abrégé: J Food Sci Technol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0056471

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
revised: 22 03 2019
accepted: 26 03 2019
entrez: 7 6 2019
pubmed: 7 6 2019
medline: 7 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The processed meats are classified in the first category of carcinogenic compounds due to its numerous health issues. For this reason, there is a growing interest to utilize healthy ingredients for formulation of meat-based products. The objective of this study was to replace completely and partially meat by plant proteins in sausage formulation and compare the characteristics of these novel formulae with full meat sample. The results showed that the plant proteins minimized the cooking loss and shrinkage and improved emulsion stability by creating a strong structural network in cooked emulsion. In contrast, the full meat samples had better strength/elasticity in terms of folding score (4.67 out of 5) and gel strength (2553.68 g mm) when compared to meat-reduced and meat-free samples. The sensory assessment showed that replacement of chicken meat by plant proteins was highly acceptable in terms of texture, odor, color and overall acceptance. Overall, it is concluded that plant proteins can be regarded as promising ingredients to replace 80-100% meat in sausage.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31168148
doi: 10.1007/s13197-019-03754-1
pii: 3754
pmc: PMC6525691
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2660-2669

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Meat Sci. 2008 Aug;79(4):767-76
pubmed: 22063041
Meat Sci. 2001 Apr;57(4):437-43
pubmed: 22061717
Meat Sci. 2009 Jun;82(2):266-71
pubmed: 20416740
Meat Sci. 2006 Sep;74(1):219-29
pubmed: 22062731
Meat Sci. 2008 Apr;78(4):447-54
pubmed: 22062464
Meat Sci. 2004 Nov;68(3):383-9
pubmed: 22062406
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2010 Sep;9(5):513-529
pubmed: 33467834
Meat Sci. 2004 Oct;68(2):291-6
pubmed: 22062239
J Food Sci Technol. 2010 Jun;47(3):290-4
pubmed: 23572639
Meat Sci. 2007 May;76(1):9-18
pubmed: 22064186
Diabetologia. 2003 Nov;46(11):1465-73
pubmed: 14576980
Meat Sci. 2006 Oct;74(2):404-8
pubmed: 22062852
Meat Sci. 2008 Oct;80(2):396-400
pubmed: 22063345
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2015;35(6):841-6
pubmed: 26877645
Meat Sci. 2011 Jan;87(1):54-60
pubmed: 20875930
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(9):1241-5
pubmed: 24915320
Meat Sci. 2014 Aug;97(4):410-8
pubmed: 24769097
Meat Sci. 2008 Nov;80(3):607-14
pubmed: 22063572
Meat Sci. 2014 Aug;97(4):459-67
pubmed: 24769144

Auteurs

Mohammad Hassan Kamani (MH)

1Department of Grain Science and Technology, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka 570020 India.

Manchanahally Shivanna Meera (MS)

1Department of Grain Science and Technology, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka 570020 India.

Narayan Bhaskar (N)

2Department of Meat and Marine Sciences, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka 570020 India.

Vinod Kumar Modi (VK)

2Department of Meat and Marine Sciences, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, Karnataka 570020 India.

Classifications MeSH