Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction in Breast Conservation Surgery: Improving the Oncological and Aesthetic Outcomes.
Breast conservation surgery
Cosmetic outcome
Oncologic outcome
Oncoplasty
Journal
Indian journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 0975-7651
Titre abrégé: Indian J Surg Oncol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101532448
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
26
06
2018
accepted:
03
03
2019
entrez:
7
6
2019
pubmed:
7
6
2019
medline:
7
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Breast conservation surgery (BCS) is now the standard of care for patients with early breast cancer. The main contraindications for BCS besides the presence of multicentricity and diffuse microcalcifications are inadequate tumour size to breast size ratio. With the advent of oncoplastic techniques, the indications of BCS may be further extended to patient with larger tumour size and or small volume breast. We prospectively assessed 42 patients undergoing oncoplastic breast conservation surgery for cosmetic and oncologic outcomes. Cosmetic outcome assessment was done by comparison of operated breast to contralateral breast by an independent surgeon, nurse and patient's attendant at 6 months post-surgery. Risk factors for compromised oncologic outcomes included grades II/III tumours and non-ductal histology. Intraoperative margin assessment with frozen section analysis proved to be important in order to achieve negative surgical margins on final histopathology. By univariate analysis, tumours located in central quadrant and medial half of the breast had similar cosmetic outcomes comparable to tumours located in other quadrants. Majority of our patients (90%) had overall good to excellent cosmetic outcomes on Harvard scale. Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery techniques allow for larger parenchymal resections without compromising oncologic and cosmetic results. It further allows extension of BCS to patients otherwise denied for the same based on earlier recommendations for mastectomy. Oncoplastic techniques and intraoperative margin assessment with frozen section are vital in attaining adequate margins and also decrease chance of local recurrence and revision surgery for positive margins.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31168252
doi: 10.1007/s13193-019-00900-1
pii: 900
pmc: PMC6527618
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
303-308Références
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1233-41
pubmed: 12393820
Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):26-34
pubmed: 12496527
Br J Surg. 2003 Dec;90(12):1505-9
pubmed: 14648728
Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul;12(7):539-45
pubmed: 15889210
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):605-14
pubmed: 17151794
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Apr;14(4):1458-71
pubmed: 17260108
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct;14(10):2953-60
pubmed: 17674109
Eur J Cancer. 1991;27(11):1395-400
pubmed: 1835855
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep;15(9):2542-9
pubmed: 18618180
Am J Surg. 2009 Jun;197(6):740-6
pubmed: 18789424
Breast Cancer. 2011 Jul;18(3):221-5
pubmed: 21465227
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3204-9
pubmed: 21861234
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;37(10):871-5
pubmed: 21868188
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012 Oct;16(11):1530-40
pubmed: 23111966
Ann Plast Surg. 2014 Feb;72(2):145-9
pubmed: 23503430
Surgeon. 2015 Jun;13(3):139-44
pubmed: 24529831
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2016 Dec 19;10:223-228
pubmed: 28008267
Arch Surg. 1989 Feb;124(2):153-7
pubmed: 2916935
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Oct;11(10):1849-52
pubmed: 4044347
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1983 Dec;9(12):1807-13
pubmed: 6662749
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Feb 15;31(4):753-64
pubmed: 7860386
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1997 Sep-Oct;21(5):362-8
pubmed: 9299007