Day case complex devices: the state of the UK.
cardiology
complex cardiac devices
day case procedures
hospital economics
Journal
Open heart
ISSN: 2053-3624
Titre abrégé: Open Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101631219
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
31
01
2019
revised:
13
03
2019
accepted:
25
03
2019
entrez:
7
6
2019
pubmed:
7
6
2019
medline:
7
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Complex cardiac devices including implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) devices can safely be implanted as a day case procedure as opposed to overnight stay. We assess how common day case complex device therapy is and the cost implications of more widespread adoption across the UK. A freedom of information request was sent to all centres performing complex cardiac devices across the UK to assess the adoption of this technique. Cost implications were assessed using Department of Health National Schedule of Reference Costs 2016-2017. 100 UK centres were surveyed, 80% replied. Eighty per cent of UK centres already implant complex cardiac devices as a day case to some extent. 64.06% of centres have a protocol for this. 12.82% of centres do <25% of complex devices as a day case. 15.38% do 25%-50% as day case. 17.95% do 50%-75% as day case and 33.33% do >75% as day case. There was no relationship between centre volume and the proportion of devices done as a day case as opposed to overnight stay. The cost saving of performing a complex device as a day case as opposed to overnight stay was £412 per ICD, £525 per CRT-pacemaker and £2169 per CRT-defibrillator. Day case complex devices are already widespread across the UK, however, there is scope for increase. An increase in proportion of day case devices could translate to £5 583 265 in savings annually for the National Health Service if all centres performed 75% of devices as a day case.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31168388
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001023
pii: openhrt-2019-001023
pmc: PMC6519613
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e001023Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 May;14(5 Pt 1):773-7
pubmed: 1712952
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD006798
pubmed: 18677781
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Aug 1;106(3):383-5
pubmed: 20643250
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Jul;36(7):885-91
pubmed: 23617456
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1986 Nov;9(6 Pt 2):1299-303
pubmed: 2432551
BMJ. 1989 Nov 4;299(6708):1139
pubmed: 2513024
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2015 Dec 30;7(4):6177
pubmed: 26793295
Am J Cardiol. 2016 May 1;117(9):1488-93
pubmed: 26993428
Can J Surg. 2017 Feb;60(1):57-62
pubmed: 28234591
Europace. 2017 Sep 1;19(9):1514-1520
pubmed: 28340223
Sci Rep. 2018 Dec 7;8(1):17709
pubmed: 30532064