Response of Sulfolobus solfataricus Dpo4 polymerase in vitro to a DNA G-quadruplex.
Journal
Mutagenesis
ISSN: 1464-3804
Titre abrégé: Mutagenesis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8707812
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 09 2019
20 09 2019
Historique:
received:
12
10
2018
accepted:
06
05
2019
pubmed:
7
6
2019
medline:
1
5
2020
entrez:
7
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Repetitive DNA sequences support the formation of structures that can interrupt replication and repair, leading to breaks and mutagenesis. One particularly stable structure is G-quadruplex (G4) DNA, which is four-stranded and formed from tandemly repetitive guanine bases. When folded within a template, G4 interferes with DNA synthesis. Similar to non-duplex structures, DNA base lesions can also halt an advancing replication fork, but the Y-family polymerases solve this problem by bypassing the damage. In order to better understand how guanine-rich DNA is replicated, we have investigated the activity of the model Y-family polymerase, Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 DNA polymerase IV (Dpo4), on guanine-rich templates in vitro. We find that Dpo4 progression on templates containing either a single GC-rich hairpin or a G4 DNA structure is greatly reduced and synthesis stalls at the structure. Human polymerase eta (hPol eta) showed the same pattern of stalling at G4; however, and in contrast to Klenow, hPol eta and Dpo4 partially synthesise into the guanine repeat. Substitution of the nucleotide selectivity residue in Dpo4 with alanine permitted ribonucleotide incorporation on unstructured templates, but this further reduced the ability of Dpo4 to synthesise across from the guanine repeats. The advancement of Dpo4 on G4 templates was highest when the reaction was supplied with only deoxycytidine triphosphate, suggesting that high-fidelity synthesis is favoured over misincorporation. Our results are consistent with a model where the Y-family polymerases pause upon encountering G4 structures but have an ability to negotiate some synthesis through tetrad-associated guanines. This suggests that the Y-family polymerases reduce mutagenesis by catalysing the accurate replication of repetitive DNA sequences, but most likely in concert with additional replication and structure resolution activities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31169295
pii: 5511860
doi: 10.1093/mutage/gez010
pmc: PMC6753385
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA
9007-49-2
DNA Polymerase beta
EC 2.7.7.7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
289-297Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R15 CA182978
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society.All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 14;9(1):e80664
pubmed: 24454683
Biochemistry. 2014 May 6;53(17):2804-14
pubmed: 24716482
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 5;114(36):9605-9610
pubmed: 28827350
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Mar 18;44(5):1989-2006
pubmed: 26883636
PLoS Biol. 2009 Oct;7(10):e1000225
pubmed: 19859523
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(19):5402-15
pubmed: 17012276
Mol Cell. 2010 Dec 10;40(5):703-13
pubmed: 21145480
J Biol Chem. 2014 Mar 28;289(13):9136-45
pubmed: 24532793
J Biol Chem. 2005 Aug 19;280(33):29750-64
pubmed: 15965231
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004 May;11(5):457-62
pubmed: 15077104
Cell. 1984 Apr;36(4):801-3
pubmed: 6608409
Mol Carcinog. 2009 Apr;48(4):319-25
pubmed: 19306310
Mol Carcinog. 2009 Apr;48(4):369-78
pubmed: 19117014
Chem Soc Rev. 2011 Dec;40(12):5893-909
pubmed: 21901191
DNA Repair (Amst). 2015 May;29:83-90
pubmed: 25704659
Science. 2009 Aug 7;325(5941):764-7
pubmed: 19661435
Front Genet. 2015 May 11;6:177
pubmed: 26029241
Biochemistry. 2014 May 6;53(17):2793-803
pubmed: 24716551
Nature. 2000 Apr 27;404(6781):1011-3
pubmed: 10801132
Annu Rev Biochem. 1984;53:163-94
pubmed: 6383193
Nature. 1988 Jul 28;334(6180):364-6
pubmed: 3393228
Cell. 1987 Dec 24;51(6):899-908
pubmed: 3690664
Genetics. 2006 Jun;173(2):697-708
pubmed: 16547095
Cell Res. 2008 Jan;18(1):148-61
pubmed: 18166979
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Nov;13(11):770-80
pubmed: 23032257
Biochemistry. 2016 Sep 20;55(37):5218-29
pubmed: 27525498
Nature. 1990 Mar 29;344(6265):410-4
pubmed: 2320109
Biochemistry. 2015 May 26;54(20):3218-30
pubmed: 25903680
Front Genet. 2015 Jun 16;6:209
pubmed: 26136769
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Mar 4;94(5):1619-22
pubmed: 9050827
Biochemistry. 2009 May 26;48(20):4239-46
pubmed: 19341290
DNA Repair (Amst). 2015 Aug;32:106-112
pubmed: 25956860
Methods Enzymol. 1992;211:191-9
pubmed: 1406307
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Nov 15;29(22):4607-16
pubmed: 11713310
FEBS J. 2017 Dec;284(23):4051-4065
pubmed: 28986969
DNA Repair (Amst). 2015 Nov;35:1-12
pubmed: 26340535
Annu Rev Biochem. 2002;71:17-50
pubmed: 12045089
Exp Cell Res. 2014 Nov 15;329(1):178-83
pubmed: 25193076
Biochemistry. 2010 Nov 30;49(47):10179-86
pubmed: 20973506
Nature. 2006 Jan 12;439(7073):225-8
pubmed: 16407906
Science. 1999 Jul 9;285(5425):263-5
pubmed: 10398605
Nature. 1999 Jun 17;399(6737):700-4
pubmed: 10385124
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013 Dec 01;5(12):a012682
pubmed: 24296168
Mol Cell. 2016 Jan 7;61(1):161-9
pubmed: 26626482
Structure. 2011 Jun 8;19(6):821-32
pubmed: 21645853
EMBO Rep. 2015 Aug;16(8):910-22
pubmed: 26150098
J Biol Chem. 1996 Aug 23;271(34):20958-64
pubmed: 8702855
J Mol Biol. 2013 Nov 29;425(23):4782-9
pubmed: 24076189