Understanding airborne contaminants produced by different fuel packages during training fires.
Firefighters
HCN
PAHs
VOCs
isocyanates
particulate
Journal
Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene
ISSN: 1545-9632
Titre abrégé: J Occup Environ Hyg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101189458
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
7
6
2019
medline:
21
7
2020
entrez:
7
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fire training may expose firefighters and instructors to hazardous airborne chemicals that vary by the training fuel. We conducted area and personal air sampling during three instructional scenarios per day involving the burning of two types (designated as alpha and bravo) of oriented strand board (OSB), pallet and straw, or the use of simulated smoke, over a period of 5 days. Twenty-four firefighters and ten instructors participated. Firefighters participated in each scenario once (separated by about 48 hr) and instructors supervised three training exercise per scenarios (completed in 1 day). Personal air samples were analyzed for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and hydrogen cyanide during live-fire scenarios (excluding simulated smoke). Area air samples were analyzed for acid gases, aldehydes, isocyanates, and VOCs for all scenarios. For the live-fire scenarios, median personal air concentrations of benzene and PAHs exceeded applicable short-term exposure limits and were higher among firefighters than instructors. When comparing results by type of fuel, personal air concentrations of benzene and PAHs were higher for bravo OSB compared to other fuels. Median area air concentrations of aldehydes and isocyanates were also highest during the bravo OSB scenario, while pallet and straw produced the highest median concentrations of certain VOCs and acid gases. These results suggest usage of self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) by both instructors and firefighters is essential during training fires to reduce potential inhalation exposure. Efforts should be taken to clean skin and clothing as soon as possible after live-fire training to limit dermal absorption as well.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31169466
doi: 10.1080/15459624.2019.1617870
pmc: PMC8591790
mid: NIHMS1753231
doi:
Substances chimiques
Air Pollutants, Occupational
0
Gases
0
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
0
Smoke
0
Volatile Organic Compounds
0
Hydrogen Cyanide
2WTB3V159F
Benzene
J64922108F
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
532-543Subventions
Organisme : Intramural CDC HHS
ID : CC999999
Pays : United States
Références
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1997 Jan;58(1):23-8
pubmed: 9018833
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2019 Aug;222(7):991-1000
pubmed: 31272797
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018 May;15(5):399-412
pubmed: 29494297
J Occup Environ Med. 2006 Nov;48(11):1189-202
pubmed: 17099456
Ann Occup Hyg. 1991 Dec;35(6):581-602
pubmed: 1768008
Occup Environ Med. 2015 Oct;72(10):699-706
pubmed: 25673342
Occup Med (Lond). 2016 Oct;66(7):536-42
pubmed: 27371948
Toxicol Lett. 2010 Jan 15;192(1):61-5
pubmed: 19576276
Occup Environ Med. 2014 Jun;71(6):388-97
pubmed: 24142974
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(4):227-34
pubmed: 25679824
Ergonomics. 2018 Mar;61(3):404-419
pubmed: 28737481
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Oct;14(10):801-814
pubmed: 28636458
AIHAJ. 2000 Sep-Oct;61(5):636-41
pubmed: 11071414