Protocol for a multi-centre pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial with a nested qualitative study: rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair (the RaCeR study).
Exercise Therapy
/ adverse effects
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Immobilization
/ adverse effects
Interviews as Topic
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Orthopedic Fixation Devices
Pilot Projects
Qualitative Research
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Recovery of Function
Rotator Cuff
/ physiopathology
Rotator Cuff Injuries
/ diagnosis
Shoulder Pain
/ diagnosis
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United Kingdom
Exercise
Physiotherapy
Randomised controlled trial
Rehabilitation
Rotator cuff
Shoulder
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jun 2019
06 Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
17
01
2019
accepted:
06
05
2019
entrez:
8
6
2019
pubmed:
7
6
2019
medline:
3
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Shoulder pain is a highly prevalent complaint and disorders of the rotator cuff, including tears, are thought to be the most common cause. The number of operations repair the torn rotator cuff has risen significantly in recent years. While surgical techniques have progressed, becoming less invasive and more secure, rehabilitation programmes have remained largely like those initially developed when surgical techniques were less advanced and more invasive. Uncertainty remains in relation to the length of post-surgical immobilisation and the amount of early load permitted at the repair site. In the context of this uncertainty, current practice is to follow a generally cautious approach, including long periods of immobilisation in a sling and avoidance of early active rehabilitation. Systematic review evidence suggests early mobilisation might be beneficial but further high-quality studies are required to evaluate this. RaCeR is a two-arm, multi-centre pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial with nested qualitative interviews. A total of 76 patients with non-traumatic rotator cuff tears who are scheduled to have a surgical repair will be recruited from up to five UK NHS hospitals and randomly allocated to either early patient-directed rehabilitation or standard rehabilitation that incorporates sling immobilisation. RaCeR will assess the feasibility of a future, substantive, multi-centre randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that, compared to standard rehabilitation incorporating sling immobilisation, early patient-directed rehabilitation is both more clinically effective and more cost-effective. In addition, a sample of patients and clinicians will be interviewed to understand the acceptability of the interventions and the barriers and enablers to adherence to the interventions. Research to date suggests that there is the possibility of reducing the patient burden associated with post-operative immobilisation following surgery to repair the torn rotator cuff and improve clinical outcomes. There is a clear need for a high-quality, adequately powered, randomised trial to better inform clinical practice. Prior to a large-scale trial, we first need to undertake a pilot and feasibility trial to address current uncertainties about recruitment, retention and barriers to adherence to the interventions, particularly in relation to whether patients will be willing to begin moving their arm early after their operation. ISRCTN Registry, 18357968 . Registered on 10 August 2018.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Shoulder pain is a highly prevalent complaint and disorders of the rotator cuff, including tears, are thought to be the most common cause. The number of operations repair the torn rotator cuff has risen significantly in recent years. While surgical techniques have progressed, becoming less invasive and more secure, rehabilitation programmes have remained largely like those initially developed when surgical techniques were less advanced and more invasive. Uncertainty remains in relation to the length of post-surgical immobilisation and the amount of early load permitted at the repair site. In the context of this uncertainty, current practice is to follow a generally cautious approach, including long periods of immobilisation in a sling and avoidance of early active rehabilitation. Systematic review evidence suggests early mobilisation might be beneficial but further high-quality studies are required to evaluate this.
METHODS/DESIGN
METHODS
RaCeR is a two-arm, multi-centre pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial with nested qualitative interviews. A total of 76 patients with non-traumatic rotator cuff tears who are scheduled to have a surgical repair will be recruited from up to five UK NHS hospitals and randomly allocated to either early patient-directed rehabilitation or standard rehabilitation that incorporates sling immobilisation. RaCeR will assess the feasibility of a future, substantive, multi-centre randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that, compared to standard rehabilitation incorporating sling immobilisation, early patient-directed rehabilitation is both more clinically effective and more cost-effective. In addition, a sample of patients and clinicians will be interviewed to understand the acceptability of the interventions and the barriers and enablers to adherence to the interventions.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Research to date suggests that there is the possibility of reducing the patient burden associated with post-operative immobilisation following surgery to repair the torn rotator cuff and improve clinical outcomes. There is a clear need for a high-quality, adequately powered, randomised trial to better inform clinical practice. Prior to a large-scale trial, we first need to undertake a pilot and feasibility trial to address current uncertainties about recruitment, retention and barriers to adherence to the interventions, particularly in relation to whether patients will be willing to begin moving their arm early after their operation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ISRCTN Registry, 18357968 . Registered on 10 August 2018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31171031
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3407-3
pii: 10.1186/s13063-019-3407-3
pmc: PMC6554931
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
328Subventions
Organisme : Research for Patient Benefit Programme
ID : PB-PG-0816-20009
Références
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Feb 10;7:12
pubmed: 16472394
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jan;129(1):119-23
pubmed: 18183410
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 May 15;61(5):623-32
pubmed: 19405008
Clin Rehabil. 2009 Jul;23(7):622-38
pubmed: 19482895
BMJ. 2009 Oct 14;339:b4122
pubmed: 19828645
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2011;45(1):23-33
pubmed: 21478659
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):301-8
pubmed: 22169081
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):815-21
pubmed: 22287641
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Nov;21(11):1450-5
pubmed: 22554876
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Oct;98(6 Suppl):S131-8
pubmed: 22944392
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7
pubmed: 23295957
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jan 1;96(1):11-9
pubmed: 24382719
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Mar 19;96(6):e44
pubmed: 24647511
Bone Joint Res. 2014 May;3(5):155-60
pubmed: 24845913
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Dec;23(12):1913-1921
pubmed: 25441568
Clin Rehabil. 2015 Sep;29(9):844-54
pubmed: 25452634
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;49(20):1316-28
pubmed: 25677796
Int J Rehabil Res. 2015 Jun;38(2):95-106
pubmed: 25715230
Bone Joint J. 2015 Sep;97-B(9):1257-63
pubmed: 26330594
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct;19(80):1-218
pubmed: 26463717
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:166-74
pubmed: 26898705
Shoulder Elbow. 2015 Apr;7(2):115-24
pubmed: 27582966
Shoulder Elbow. 2015 Jul;7(3):193-204
pubmed: 27582979
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Jan;52(2):111-121
pubmed: 28039127
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Jul;78(4):593-600
pubmed: 8682827