Energetic and Informational Components of Speech-on-Speech Masking in Binaural Speech Intelligibility and Perceived Listening Effort.


Journal

Trends in hearing
ISSN: 2331-2165
Titre abrégé: Trends Hear
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635698

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez: 8 6 2019
pubmed: 8 6 2019
medline: 28 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Speech perception in complex sound fields can greatly benefit from different unmasking cues to segregate the target from interfering voices. This study investigated the role of three unmasking cues (spatial separation, gender differences, and masker time reversal) on speech intelligibility and perceived listening effort in normal-hearing listeners. Speech intelligibility and categorically scaled listening effort were measured for a female target talker masked by two competing talkers with no unmasking cues or one to three unmasking cues. In addition to natural stimuli, all measurements were also conducted with glimpsed speech-which was created by removing the time-frequency tiles of the speech mixture in which the maskers dominated the mixture-to estimate the relative amounts of informational and energetic masking as well as the effort associated with source segregation. The results showed that all unmasking cues as well as glimpsing improved intelligibility and reduced listening effort and that providing more than one cue was beneficial in overcoming informational masking. The reduction in listening effort due to glimpsing corresponded to increases in signal-to-noise ratio of 8 to 18 dB, indicating that a significant amount of listening effort was devoted to segregating the target from the maskers. Furthermore, the benefit in listening effort for all unmasking cues extended well into the range of positive signal-to-noise ratios at which speech intelligibility was at ceiling, suggesting that listening effort is a useful tool for evaluating speech-on-speech masking conditions at typical conversational levels.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31172880
doi: 10.1177/2331216519854597
pmc: PMC6557024
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2331216519854597

Subventions

Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R01 DC004545
Pays : United States

Références

J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jun;123(6):4369-79
pubmed: 18537388
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Jul;140(1):132
pubmed: 27475139
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Feb;141(2):EL170
pubmed: 28253635
Front Neurosci. 2013 Dec 23;7:252
pubmed: 24391535
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Mar;109(3):1101-9
pubmed: 11303924
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Dec;118(6):3804-15
pubmed: 16419825
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Jul;98(1):125-34
pubmed: 7608391
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Dec;120(6):4007-18
pubmed: 17225427
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Jun;125(6):4006-22
pubmed: 19507982
Int J Audiol. 2015;54 Suppl 2:3-16
pubmed: 26383182
Am J Audiol. 2017 Oct 12;26(3S):378-392
pubmed: 29049622
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Jun;111(6):2801-10
pubmed: 12083215
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Mar;101(3):1660-70
pubmed: 9069633
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Jun;141(6):4680
pubmed: 28679238
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Sep;116(3):1607-13
pubmed: 15478426
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Nov;136(5):2642-53
pubmed: 25373965
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Oct;144(4):2147
pubmed: 30404476
Int J Audiol. 2013 Nov;52(11):753-61
pubmed: 24053226
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Nov;118(5):3164-76
pubmed: 16334898
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jul;77(5):1465-87
pubmed: 25828463
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec;124(6):3793-802
pubmed: 19206805
Front Neurosci. 2014 Apr 29;8:88
pubmed: 24808818
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):2998-10
pubmed: 21110595
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37 Suppl 1:5S-27S
pubmed: 27355771
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):183-96
pubmed: 25690777
J Exp Psychol. 1952 Jul;44(1):51-5
pubmed: 14955590
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 May;109(5 Pt 1):2112-22
pubmed: 11386563
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Nov;64(8):1325-36
pubmed: 12519029
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Mar;129(3):1616-25
pubmed: 21428524
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Apr;131(4):3103-10
pubmed: 22501083
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Apr;137(4):1888-98
pubmed: 25920841
J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Aug;124(2):1146-58
pubmed: 18681603
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Jun;18(3):457-464
pubmed: 28101695
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Jun;131(6):4596-605
pubmed: 22712933
Int J Audiol. 2016 Dec;55(12):738-747
pubmed: 27627181

Auteurs

Jan Rennies (J)

1 Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA, USA.
2 Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Media Technology IDMT, Project Group Hearing, Speech and Audio Technology, Oldenburg, Germany.
3 Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.

Virginia Best (V)

1 Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA, USA.

Elin Roverud (E)

1 Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA, USA.

Gerald Kidd (G)

1 Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH