Validation of prognostic models in intensive care unit-treated pediatric traumatic brain injury patients.
AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
EHR = electronic healthcare record
FICC = Finnish Intensive Care Consortium
GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale
GOS = Glasgow Outcome Scale
ICP = intracranial pressure
IMPACT = International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials
IVH = intraventricular hemorrhage
TBI = traumatic brain injury
TISS = Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System
intensive care unit
outcome
pediatric
prognosis
trauma
traumatic brain injury
Journal
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
ISSN: 1933-0715
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Pediatr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101463759
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jun 2019
07 Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
08
02
2019
accepted:
16
04
2019
pubmed:
8
6
2019
medline:
8
6
2019
entrez:
8
6
2019
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
There are few specific prognostic models specifically developed for the pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) population. In the present study, the authors tested the predictive performance of existing prognostic tools, originally developed for the adult TBI population, in pediatric TBI patients requiring stays in the ICU. The authors used the Finnish Intensive Care Consortium database to identify pediatric patients (< 18 years of age) treated in 4 academic ICUs in Finland between 2003 and 2013. They tested the predictive performance of 4 classification systems-the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) TBI model, the Helsinki CT score, the Rotterdam CT score, and the Marshall CT classification-by assessing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the explanatory variation (pseudo-R2 statistic). The primary outcome was 6-month functional outcome (favorable outcome defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4-5). Overall, 341 patients (median age 14 years) were included; of these, 291 patients had primary head CT scans available. The IMPACT core-based model showed an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.91) and a pseudo-R2 value of 0.40. Of the CT scoring systems, the Helsinki CT score displayed the highest performance (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.90; pseudo-R2 0.39) followed by the Rotterdam CT score (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.86; pseudo-R2 0.34). Prognostic tools originally developed for the adult TBI population seemed to perform well in pediatric TBI. Of the tested CT scoring systems, the Helsinki CT score yielded the highest predictive value.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31174193
doi: 10.3171/2019.4.PEDS1983
pii: 2019.4.PEDS1983
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng