Validation of prognostic models in intensive care unit-treated pediatric traumatic brain injury patients.

AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve EHR = electronic healthcare record FICC = Finnish Intensive Care Consortium GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale GOS = Glasgow Outcome Scale ICP = intracranial pressure IMPACT = International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials IVH = intraventricular hemorrhage TBI = traumatic brain injury TISS = Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System intensive care unit outcome pediatric prognosis trauma traumatic brain injury

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
ISSN: 1933-0715
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Pediatr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101463759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 08 02 2019
accepted: 16 04 2019
pubmed: 8 6 2019
medline: 8 6 2019
entrez: 8 6 2019
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

There are few specific prognostic models specifically developed for the pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) population. In the present study, the authors tested the predictive performance of existing prognostic tools, originally developed for the adult TBI population, in pediatric TBI patients requiring stays in the ICU. The authors used the Finnish Intensive Care Consortium database to identify pediatric patients (< 18 years of age) treated in 4 academic ICUs in Finland between 2003 and 2013. They tested the predictive performance of 4 classification systems-the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) TBI model, the Helsinki CT score, the Rotterdam CT score, and the Marshall CT classification-by assessing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the explanatory variation (pseudo-R2 statistic). The primary outcome was 6-month functional outcome (favorable outcome defined as a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4-5). Overall, 341 patients (median age 14 years) were included; of these, 291 patients had primary head CT scans available. The IMPACT core-based model showed an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.91) and a pseudo-R2 value of 0.40. Of the CT scoring systems, the Helsinki CT score displayed the highest performance (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.90; pseudo-R2 0.39) followed by the Rotterdam CT score (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.86; pseudo-R2 0.34). Prognostic tools originally developed for the adult TBI population seemed to perform well in pediatric TBI. Of the tested CT scoring systems, the Helsinki CT score yielded the highest predictive value.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31174193
doi: 10.3171/2019.4.PEDS1983
pii: 2019.4.PEDS1983
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1-8

Auteurs

Era D Mikkonen (ED)

1Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, and Department of Emergency Care and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki.

Markus B Skrifvars (MB)

2Department of Emergency Care and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki.

Matti Reinikainen (M)

Departments of3Anesthesiology and.

Stepani Bendel (S)

4Intensive Care, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio.

Ruut Laitio (R)

5Department of Intensive Care, Turku University Hospital, and University of Turku.

Sanna Hoppu (S)

6Emergency Medical Services, and Department of Intensive Care, Tampere University Hospital, and Tampere University, Tampere.

Tero Ala-Kokko (T)

7Division of Intensive Care, Medical Research Center Oulu MRC, Oulu University Hospital, Research Unit of Anesthesiology, Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Oulu; and.

Atte Karppinen (A)

8Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Finland.

Rahul Raj (R)

8Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Finland.

Classifications MeSH