Spinal radiographic progression over 2 years in ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with secukinumab: a historical cohort comparison.


Journal

Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 06 2019
Historique:
received: 29 11 2018
accepted: 07 05 2019
entrez: 9 6 2019
pubmed: 9 6 2019
medline: 30 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to compare radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated for up to 2 years with secukinumab (MEASURE 1) with a historical cohort of biologic-naïve patients treated with NSAIDs (ENRADAS). Baseline and 2-year lateral cervical and lumbar spine radiographs were independently evaluated using mSASSS by two readers, who were blinded to the chronology and cohort of the radiographs. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with no radiographic progression (mSASSS change ≤ 0 from baseline to year 2). The Primary Analysis Set included patients with baseline (≤ day 30) and post-baseline day 31-743 radiographs. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the comparison between the two cohorts, as follows: Sensitivity Analysis Set 1 included all patients with baseline (≤ day 30) and year 2 (days 640-819) radiographs; Sensitivity Analysis Set 2 included all patients with baseline and post-baseline (> day 30) radiographs. A total of 168 patients (84%) from the MEASURE 1 cohort and 69 (57%) from the ENRADAS cohort qualified for the Primary Analysis Set. Over 2 years, the LS (SE) mean change from baseline in mSASSS for the primary analysis was 0.55 (0.139) for MEASURE 1 vs 0.89 (0.216) for ENRADAS (p = 0.1852). Mean changes from baseline in mSASSS were lower in MEASURE 1 vs ENRADAS for the primary and sensitivity analyses. The proportion of patients with no radiographic progression was consistently higher in the MEASURE 1 vs ENRADAS cohort across all cutoffs for no radiographic progression (change in mSASSS from baseline to year 2 of ≤ 0, ≤ 0.5, ≤ 1, and ≤ 2), but the differences were not statistically significant. Secukinumab-treated patients demonstrated a numerical, but statistically non-significant, higher proportion of non-progressors and lower change in mSASSS over 2 years versus a cohort of biologic-naïve patients treated with NSAIDs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31174584
doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1911-1
pii: 10.1186/s13075-019-1911-1
pmc: PMC6555995
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Interleukin-17 0
secukinumab DLG4EML025

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

142

Références

J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2286-91
pubmed: 7699630
J Cutan Med Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;13(4):198-203
pubmed: 19706227
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Oct;71(10):1616-22
pubmed: 22459541
Lancet. 2013 Nov 23;382(9906):1705-13
pubmed: 24035250
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 May 1;58(5):859-868
pubmed: 30590813
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):1107-13
pubmed: 23644549
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Jun;52(6):1756-65
pubmed: 15934081
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Oct;70(10):1758-64
pubmed: 21791453
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Jul;69(7):1011-1019
pubmed: 27696754
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):1070-1077
pubmed: 27965257
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Aug;73(8):1455-61
pubmed: 24812292
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 16;10(4):e0122693
pubmed: 25879956
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2534-48
pubmed: 26699169
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Mar 1;58(3):388-400
pubmed: 29860356
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):863-7
pubmed: 18628283
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Oct;65(10):2645-54
pubmed: 23818109
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;12(2):72
pubmed: 26794859
J Rheumatol. 2004 Jan;31(1):125-32
pubmed: 14705231
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct;58(10):3063-70
pubmed: 18821688
J Rheumatol. 2009 May;36(5):997-1002
pubmed: 19332632
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jan;77(1):63-69
pubmed: 28939631
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Aug;75(8):1438-43
pubmed: 26242443
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 May;58(5):1324-31
pubmed: 18438853
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 May;77(5):699-705
pubmed: 29343510
Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(4):R127
pubmed: 19703304

Auteurs

J Braun (J)

Rheumazentrum Herne, Herne, Germany. juergen.braun@elisabethgruppe.de.

H Haibel (H)

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

M de Hooge (M)

VIB Inflammation Research Center, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

R Landewé (R)

Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.

M Rudwaleit (M)

Klinikum Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.

T Fox (T)

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

A Readie (A)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, USA.

H B Richards (HB)

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

B Porter (B)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, USA.

R Martin (R)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, USA.

D Poddubnyy (D)

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

J Sieper (J)

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

D van der Heijde (D)

VIB Inflammation Research Center, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH